On 10/01/2014 4:33 AM, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
Hello,
On 1/9/14, 12:14 PM, nano wrote:
On 10/01/2014 2:21 AM, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
Hello,
On 1/9/14, 7:24 AM, nano wrote:
[snip]
I share your opinion regarding nginx documentation. It is woeful.
Particularly when compared to other exemplary open
Hello,
On 1/9/14, 12:14 PM, nano wrote:
On 10/01/2014 2:21 AM, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
Hello,
On 1/9/14, 7:24 AM, nano wrote:
[snip]
I share your opinion regarding nginx documentation. It is woeful.
Particularly when compared to other exemplary open source projects, such
as Postfix and FreeBSD
On 10/01/2014 2:21 AM, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
Hello,
On 1/9/14, 7:24 AM, nano wrote:
[snip]
I share your opinion regarding nginx documentation. It is woeful.
Particularly when compared to other exemplary open source projects, such
as Postfix and FreeBSD. My inability to easily transfer my webse
Hello,
On 1/9/14, 7:24 AM, nano wrote:
[snip]
I share your opinion regarding nginx documentation. It is woeful.
Particularly when compared to other exemplary open source projects, such
as Postfix and FreeBSD. My inability to easily transfer my webservers to
nginx from Apache, due to (my own s
On 9/01/2014 11:47 PM, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
On 9 January 2014 12:24, nano wrote:
I share your opinion regarding nginx documentation. It is woeful.
Sorry chap - I didn't say that and I don't think that. There may well
be some specific target audiences not well served by the aggregate of
th
Hello!
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:12:09PM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> On 9 January 2014 11:57, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:21:43AM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> >
> >> On 9 January 2014 10:03, basti wrote:
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > I have a clos
On 9 January 2014 12:24, nano wrote:
> I share your opinion regarding nginx documentation. It is woeful.
Sorry chap - I didn't say that and I don't think that. There may well
be some specific target audiences not well served by the aggregate of
the current (psuedo-)documentation sources, but that
On 9/01/2014 11:12 PM, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
On 9 January 2014 11:57, Maxim Dounin wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:21:43AM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
On 9 January 2014 10:03, basti wrote:
Hello,
I have a closed-source Webapp that run on an IIS-Webserver and send a
"X-Fram
On 9 January 2014 11:57, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:21:43AM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
>
>> On 9 January 2014 10:03, basti wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I have a closed-source Webapp that run on an IIS-Webserver and send a
>> > "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN" he
Hello!
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:21:43AM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> On 9 January 2014 10:03, basti wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a closed-source Webapp that run on an IIS-Webserver and send a
> > "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN" header.
> > I also have to implement this Webapp in my own,
Hello!
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:03:11AM +0100, basti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a closed-source Webapp that run on an IIS-Webserver and send a
> "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN" header.
> I also have to implement this Webapp in my own, Frame based Application.
>
> So I try to use nginx as a reve
On 9 January 2014 10:03, basti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a closed-source Webapp that run on an IIS-Webserver and send a
> "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN" header.
> I also have to implement this Webapp in my own, Frame based Application.
>
> So I try to use nginx as a reverse Proxy, but the X-Frame-
Hello,
I have a closed-source Webapp that run on an IIS-Webserver and send a
"X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN" header.
I also have to implement this Webapp in my own, Frame based Application.
So I try to use nginx as a reverse Proxy, but the X-Frame-Options Header
is still send.
How can I remove his
13 matches
Mail list logo
