http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2010/09/enola_motorcyclist_clocked_at.html
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
To post to this group, send email to nighthawk_lov...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from t
Hm, nobody in our group I hope...
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:50 AM, wrote:
>
> http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2010/09/enola_motorcyclist_clocked_at.html
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
> To
What a dumbass. Some of the comments are worse, though... Talk about
some stereotyping!
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Chris Besignano
wrote:
> Hm, nobody in our group I hope...
>
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:50 AM, wrote:
>>
>>
>> http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2010/09/enola_
I wonder what the top speed of our bikes are. I'd have to figure out what
redline in 6th gear is I guess.
-Kyle
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Chris Besignano
wrote:
> Hm, nobody in our group I hope...
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:50 AM, wrote:
>
>>
>> http://www.pennlive.com/midsta
According to calculations, my stock geared, stock sprocketed '93 with
a 150/70/R17 on the back end will top out at 131mph. I don't think
she'd like it very much up there, I know I wouldn't. Roads around here
are crap, lots of transitions and dips from all the patches laid down
in lieu of actual rep
I haven't done the math myself, but here's what the internet says.
> Maximum speed in gears @ redline: (1) 49, (2) 71, (3) 89, (4) 106, (5) 127,
> (6) 147
>
I've gone about that fast in a car (142) but don't have the guts to try it
on a bike. That was several years ago too, I might not have the gu
I've hit 80. Much more comfortable 65-75. Usually cruise in to work or
school around 50-60, depending on the speed limit and traffic flow.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Kyle Munz wrote:
> I haven't done the math myself, but here's what the internet says.
>>
>> Maximum speed in gears @ redline
I'v had my 550 to 115.
rodhall
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Munz
To: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
Sent: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 10:58 am
Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] I-81 isn't very smooth in some section's to
even do the speed limit
I haven't done
2010 10:58 am
> Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] I-81 isn't very smooth in some section's to
> even do the speed limit
>
> I haven't done the math myself, but here's what the internet says.
>
>> Maximum speed in gears @ redline: (1) 49, (2) 71, (3) 89, (4) 106,
17, 2010 at 11:11 AM, wrote:
>>
>> I'v had my 550 to 115.
>>
>> rodhall
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kyle Munz
>> To: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
>> Sent: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 10:58 am
>> Subje
bject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] I-81 isn't very smooth in some section's to
even
do the speed limit
I think Tim and I topped out around 75 coming back from Greenville.
Might have been lower, we didn't want to push that old kinked chain.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Kyle Munz wrote:
ups.com
Sent: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 10:58 am
Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] I-81 isn't very smooth in some section's to
even do the speed limit
I haven't done the math myself, but here's what the internet says.
Maximum speed in gears @ redline: (1) 49, (2) 71, (3) 89, (4) 106
I have pushed my wing up to 102 just to say i did it, but i rarely do more then
85-90
-Original Message-
Date: Friday, September 17, 2010 11:59:23 am
To: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
From: "Kyle Munz"
Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] I-81 isn't very smooth in so
They might if the engines were balanced properly. :p
-Kurt
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:35 PM, wrote:
> Not when you were with me. I have only did it my Honda's. The Harley's I've
> had wouldn't go that fast.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Nighthaw
x27;t go that fast.
>
> rodhall
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kyle Munz
> To: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 11:26 am
> Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] I-81 isn't very smooth in some section's to
> even do the speed limit
&
x27;s
>> >to even do the speed limit
>> >
>> >
>> Not with me trying to follow you you haven't ;)
>> >
>> >-Kyle
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:11 AM, wrote:
>> >
>> >PADDING-L
; Date: Friday, September 17, 2010 11:59:23 am
> To: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
> From: "Kyle Munz"
> Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] I-81 isn't very smooth in some section's to
> even do the speed limit
>
> I haven't done the math myself, but
Where in Puerto Rico are you from Stanley?
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:18:21 -0700
From: tinkrm...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] I-81 isn't very smooth in some section's to
even do the speed limit
To: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
Just to do it, I went over
z <kyle...@gmail.com>>To: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 11:26 am>Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] I-81 isn't very smooth in some section's >to even do the speed limit>>
Not with me trying to follow you you haven't ;)>>-Ky
19 matches
Mail list logo
