On 01/28/2013 10:14 AM, Eelco Dolstra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28/01/13 14:12, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> In principle there could be just one expression in Nixpkgs, and the
>> package’s release.nix would just use ‘overrideDerivation’ to change the
>> ‘src’ attribute of that expression to point to the
Hi,
On 28/01/13 14:12, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> In principle there could be just one expression in Nixpkgs, and the
> package’s release.nix would just use ‘overrideDerivation’ to change the
> ‘src’ attribute of that expression to point to the result of the
> ‘tarball’ job.
That would kind of wor
Hi,
Eelco Dolstra skribis:
> On 25/01/13 09:32, Rickard Nilsson wrote:
>
>>> I see nix is getting quite popular :-)
>>> The maintainer is of course welcome to maintain also the nix expression
>>> *within* nixpkgs, who else is a better candidate...
>>
>> Yes, absolutely, and that is completely O
Hi,
On 25/01/13 09:32, Rickard Nilsson wrote:
>> I see nix is getting quite popular :-)
>> The maintainer is of course welcome to maintain also the nix expression
>> *within* nixpkgs, who else is a better candidate...
>
> Yes, absolutely, and that is completely OK. But you might want to keep
> a
On 01/25/2013 09:32 AM, Rickard Nilsson wrote:
Den 2013-01-24 23:01:03 skrev Vladimír Čunát :
I see nix is getting quite popular :-)
The maintainer is of course welcome to maintain also the nix expression
*within* nixpkgs, who else is a better candidate...
Yes, absolutely, and that is complete
Den 2013-01-24 23:01:03 skrev Vladimír Čunát :
> On 01/24/2013 04:13 PM, Rickard Nilsson wrote:
>> OK, I see why that is not feasible. The reason I ask, is that it seems
>> reasonable that a Nix-aware upstream package developer should be able
>> to define how the package should be built (dependenc
On 01/24/2013 04:13 PM, Rickard Nilsson wrote:
OK, I see why that is not feasible. The reason I ask, is that it seems
reasonable that a Nix-aware upstream package developer should be able
to define how the package should be built (dependencies, build flags etc),
in tandem with the package develop
Den 2013-01-22 14:51:24 skrev Eelco Dolstra :
> Hi,
>
> On 22/01/13 13:05, Rickard Nilsson wrote:
>
>> I would like to bundle nix-expressions with some of my self-developed
>> programs, and just let nixpkgs (or some custom-nixpkgs) use the
>> nix-expression from the source when building the progra
Hi,
On 22/01/13 13:05, Rickard Nilsson wrote:
> I would like to bundle nix-expressions with some of my self-developed
> programs, and just let nixpkgs (or some custom-nixpkgs) use the
> nix-expression from the source when building the program. Is this a wise
> thing to do? Is it even possib
Excerpts from Rickard Nilsson's message of Tue Jan 22 13:05:09 +0100 2013:
> I would like to bundle nix-expressions with some of my self-developed
> programs, and just let nixpkgs (or some custom-nixpkgs) use the
> nix-expression from the source when building the program. Is this a wise
> thi
Hi,
I would like to bundle nix-expressions with some of my self-developed
programs, and just let nixpkgs (or some custom-nixpkgs) use the
nix-expression from the source when building the program. Is this a wise
thing to do? Is it even possible?
A pseudo-example:
nixpkgs:
...
myprog_sr
11 matches
Mail list logo
