I have an opportunity to resolve. We use the same install process for
all of our application servers. We load the op-sys (CentOS 6) using a
pxe-boot process and a standardized kickstart file.
So wouldn't you know, I have one server out of 10 on which we may not
create a java heap space the
The first thing that jumps to my mind is the ulimit on memory size for the
user that is running the JVM.
Kent
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Howard White hwh...@vcch.com wrote:
I have an opportunity to resolve. We use the same install process for all
of our application servers. We load
On 03/13/2014 09:01 AM, Kent Perrier wrote:
The first thing that jumps to my mind is the ulimit on memory size for
the user that is running the JVM.
Kent
$ ulimit -a
core file size (blocks, -c)0
data seg size (kbytes, -d)unlimited
scheduling priority (-e)
What version of CentOS are you running?
I found this https://access.redhat.com/site/solutions/409353 that may be
related.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Howard White hwh...@vcch.com wrote:
On 03/13/2014 09:01 AM, Kent Perrier wrote:
The first thing that jumps to my mind is the ulimit on
On 03/13/2014 09:15 AM, Wesley Duffee-Braun wrote:
What version of CentOS are you running?
I found this https://access.redhat.com/site/solutions/409353 that may be
related.
yeah, that link looks kinda like this case, except... I booted the
system first thing this morning (because free -m
JVMs in production can consume many gigs of memory. With 32 bit, you
certainly won't be able to provide more than 3-4 gigs. Remember, that
because of PAE, the 4GB limit only applies to per process, so the processes
together can take far more than 4GB or 12 GB.
Memory address fragmentation could be
Looks like, from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790921, that
However, if an enormous number of small files (hundreds of thousands or
millions) was being mapped , the address space became extremely fragmented
as Csaba surmised.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Csaba Toth
On 03/13/2014 09:23 AM, Wesley Duffee-Braun wrote:
Looks like, from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790921,
that However, if an enormous number of small files (hundreds of
thousands or millions) was being mapped , the address space became
extremely fragmented as Csaba surmised.
I
On 03/13/2014 09:22 AM, Csaba Toth wrote:
JVMs in production can consume many gigs of memory. With 32 bit, you
certainly won't be able to provide more than 3-4 gigs. Remember, that
because of PAE, the 4GB limit only applies to per process, so the
processes together can take far more than 4GB or
If you don't have access to this KB article let me know and I can print it
out for you. Looks to be a kernel bug. A quick cut and paste of the
workaround section:
This issue is resolved in kernel-2.6.32.358.16.1.el6 and later.
Please update the kernel package with yum update kernel.
Workaround
Since shrinking the memory (and restoring it to the current setting) is
simplest and quickest, you might try that first. You could also try going
up to 16GB.
Andy
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Howard White hwh...@vcch.com wrote:
On 03/13/2014 09:23 AM, Wesley Duffee-Braun wrote:
Looks
On 03/13/2014 08:56 AM, Howard White wrote:
I have an opportunity to resolve. We use the same install process for
all of our application servers. We load the op-sys (CentOS 6) using a
pxe-boot process and a standardized kickstart file.
So wouldn't you know, I have one server out of 10 on
On 03/13/2014 09:44 AM, Kent Perrier wrote:
If you don't have access to this KB article let me know and I can print
it out for you. Looks to be a kernel bug. A quick cut and paste of the
workaround section:
This issue is resolved in |kernel-2.6.32.358.16.1.el6| and later.
Please update the
This is actually a good use case for using a configuration management tool
like puppet. When you built your new server would would have had a high
degree of confidence that it would be identical to the other servers in
your environment and you wouldn't have seen this issue!
Glad you it got you
Puppet is great, for sure. In this specific case, I'm not sure it would
have helped. It's still easy to have drift of packages versions in a
Puppetized environment if you aren't methodical about rolling out
updates. This is especially true for packages like the kernel, which
require
While I would possibly cheer lead for Puppet, I don't think I would have
specified anything down to the specific kernel version. I would have looked at
dependencies for the tools, and specified all of that, but the kernel is just
supposed to work.
- Original Message -
Puppet is great,
On 03/13/2014 02:16 PM, Brian Pitts wrote:
Puppet is great, for sure. In this specific case, I'm not sure it would
have helped. It's still easy to have drift of packages versions in a
Puppetized environment if you aren't methodical about rolling out
updates. This is especially true for packages
puppet + spacewalk is awesome, just saying =)
-Blake
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Howard White hwh...@vcch.com wrote:
On 03/13/2014 02:16 PM, Brian Pitts wrote:
Puppet is great, for sure. In this specific case, I'm not sure it would
have helped. It's still easy to have drift of
Hi guys,
I have not found my drafting table (yes, I still have one).
Is there anybody in the group that has done stuff with QCAD?
I could use a starter course. For that matter, I could use someone that
does drafting. It will be billable time.
Dave
615 963 4993 office
615 579 3177 cell
--
--
The viability of configuration management in any environment is highly
dependent on the amount of change in your environment. If you are mostly
static (like I am) then the investment in time and effort is hard to
justify. Now the new job I start in April is highly dynamic and they use
both puppet
I have briefly used qcad.
Let me know if you need help getting it installed and working a test
project.
However my drafting friends all use AutoCAD for some reason.
--
-
Justin W Elam
E-mail : justin.w.e...@gmail.com
###
On Mar 13, 2014 2:38 PM, David R.
Dassault Systemes offers a free 2D drafting program that can handle .dwg
files, called DraftSight. The only thing is that you have to register on
their site to get the software activated, but it's a one time activation.
They don't lock it down like Microsoft or other DRM systems.
I'm not a
Probably a question for about a Perl 150 class. My google foo is not
finding a solution.
- I've got a Perl script that will be run through a web browser.
- I want any warnings to go to the browser, so I've used CGI::Carp (and
called things appropriately).
- I have a common subroutine
23 matches
Mail list logo
