On 11/02/2013 07:31 AM, Perkins, Jerry wrote:
On 11/01/2013 07:07 AM, Mark J. Bailey wrote:
Anyone else find it interesting (and a bit worrisome too) to see Red
Hat so publically displayed as one of the major tech firms being
rushed in for Obama’s and HHS’s “tech surge” to salvage
On 11/02/2013 08:44 AM, Howard White wrote:
On 11/02/2013 07:31 AM, Perkins, Jerry wrote:
On 11/01/2013 07:07 AM, Mark J. Bailey wrote:
Anyone else find it interesting (and a bit worrisome too) to see Red
Hat so publically displayed as one of the major tech firms being
rushed in for Obama’s
It's OK, Jerry. One of Michelle O's Princeton buddies is an EVP at the
company. So it's almost 'in the family,' not quite enough to be naked
nepotism.
I feel really badly for anyone in these tech companies who got called into
the big boss's office and informed they are now 'on loan' to the
are allergic to criticism, and even more so when the
spotlight is focused so on them as it is with this fiasco.
From: nlug-talk@googlegroups.com [mailto:nlug-talk@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Curt Lundgren
Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2013 9:02 AM
To: NLUG
Subject: Re: [nlug] Red Hat
On 11/02/2013 10:09 AM, Mark J. Bailey wrote:
I bet HHS and Obama must assume anyone working at a company called
**Red** Hat must be sympathetic to their pain! :)
One other interesting thing I noted in another article was that
Microsoft actually offered their services to help sort it all
] Red Hat at HealthCare.GOV
On 11/02/2013 10:09 AM, Mark J. Bailey wrote:
I bet HHS and Obama must assume anyone working at a company called *Red*
Hat must be sympathetic to their pain! :)
One other interesting thing I noted in another article was that Microsoft
actually offered
Can you say 'share the blame'?
I read that the technology used is 10 years out of date, that 5 million
lines of code need to be rewritten, and that's not to mention the lies,
damned lies and propaganda swirling around this debacle. SIX people
successfully registered on the first day and I just
government boondoggle in recent
history.
** **
*From:* nlug-talk@googlegroups.com [mailto:nlug-talk@googlegroups.com] *On
Behalf Of *Curt Lundgren
*Sent:* Friday, November 01, 2013 7:11 AM
*To:* NLUG
*Subject:* Re: [nlug] Red Hat at HealthCare.GOV
** **
Can you say 'share the blame
To: NLUG
Subject: Re: [nlug] Red Hat at HealthCare.GOV
Don't forget that the more than half billion dollars already spent on the
site are presented to the American public as if there were no continuing
costs. Who's ever set up a complex web site you could just walk away from
because it's 'complete
Hello Mark,
Doesn't surprise me a bit. Obviously the problem is not RedHat, but the
plan for the software, testing and other things that should have
happened and didn't. Another problem was the directive to gather all of
the information before allowing a search for insurance. That was due to
they are involved. I
definitely got to Google on it some this weekend.
-Original Message-
From: nlug-talk@googlegroups.com [mailto:nlug-talk@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of David R. Wilson
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 8:43 AM
To: nlug-talk@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [nlug] Red Hat
[mailto:nlug-talk@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of David R. Wilson
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 8:43 AM
To: nlug-talk@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [nlug] Red Hat at HealthCare.GOV
Hello Mark,
Doesn't surprise me a bit. Obviously the problem is not RedHat, but the
plan for the software
, November 01, 2013 8:43 AM
To: nlug-talk@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [nlug] Red Hat at HealthCare.GOV
Hello Mark,
Doesn't surprise me a bit. Obviously the problem is not RedHat, but the
plan for the software, testing and other things that should have happened
and didn't. Another
] On
Behalf Of David R. Wilson
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 8:43 AM
To: nlug-talk@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [nlug] Red Hat at HealthCare.GOV
Hello Mark,
Doesn't surprise me a bit. Obviously the problem is not RedHat, but the
plan for the software, testing and other things that should
it in the allotted timeframe if it truly is as bad
as some tech analysts are saying.
From: nlug-talk@googlegroups.com [mailto:nlug-talk@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Kent Perrier
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 10:47 AM
To: nlug-talk
Subject: Re: [nlug] Red Hat at HealthCare.GOV
Just look
@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of David R. Wilson
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 8:43 AM
To: nlug-talk@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [nlug] Red Hat at HealthCare.GOV
Hello Mark,
Doesn't surprise me a bit. Obviously the problem is not RedHat, but the
plan for the software, testing
if it truly is as bad
as some tech analysts are saying.
** **
*From:* nlug-talk@googlegroups.com [mailto:nlug-talk@googlegroups.com] *On
Behalf Of *Kent Perrier
*Sent:* Friday, November 01, 2013 10:47 AM
*To:* nlug-talk
*Subject:* Re: [nlug] Red Hat at HealthCare.GOV
** **
Just look
Single payer and then you don't need a website ;P
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Bill Woody woody39...@gmail.com wrote:
Dangit!!! Somany of you sound like, ..but what if... Admittedly, I am a
big fan of Red Hat but, come on; Who else can fix this? Red Hat is the
current biggie!
--
Greg
18 matches
Mail list logo
