.
Constructive comments are probablly best sent directly to me
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) for the time being so they'll filter separately from
the list mail and will wind up in my inbox where I'm more likely to
notice.
--
Doug Morris
Morris Communications Computer Services, Inc.
http://www.mhost.com/
was the thing that had me so concerned. Not that it's especially
fancy or anything, but... If a non-authorized person managed to post
to the list, or if I'd authorized someone who spammed the list for the
entire weekend, it's be a pain.
--
Doug Morris
Morris Communications Computer Services, Inc
Sorry, I just re-approved an already sent nmh-bugs post. It's a
duplicate, please ignore.
--
Doug Morris
Morris Communications Computer Services, Inc.
http://www.mhost.com/
sourcw tiht +dev (hence, I am running version 1.0.4+dev at the
moment). The discussion is in the mailing list archives.
--
Doug Morris
Morris Communications Computer Services, Inc.
http://www.mhost.com/
an account cleanup (ie: get rid of 'em).
--
Doug Morris
Morris Communications Computer Services, Inc.
http://www.mhost.com/
and
it gives me a place to put up my climbing pictures and, of course,
to host projects.
--
Doug Morris
Morris Communications Computer Services, Inc.
http://www.mhost.com/
Peter Whaite wrote:
The last couple of days the mh-format %(clock{date}) function is returning
non integer values. For example...
Seems to be a problem with exceeding 1 Billion Seconds. It begins
on 9 September.
--
Doug Morris
Morris Communications Computer Services, Inc.
http://www.mhost.com/
we want, anyway, until this
is fixed.
I'll play with them a bit this afternoon.
--
Doug Morris
Morris Communications Computer Services, Inc.
http://www.mhost.com/
es it couldn't parse.
I've had problems in the past when using nmh on news files. They may
be worthwhile for stress-testing it.
--
Doug Morris
Morris Communications Computer Services, Inc.
http://www.mhost.com/
and
of promoting the sharing and reuse of software generally.
--
Doug Morris
Morris Communications Computer Services, Inc.
http://www.mhost.com/
your public keys
over, so your priviledges should remain the same.
Mail me if you run into any problems.
--
Doug Morris
Morris Communications Computer Services, Inc.
http://www.mhost.com/
Huy Le wrote:
This gives me a seg fault on linux with nmh-1.0.2:
scan -format '1' +inbox
On Sun, 09 Apr 2000 17:28:09 +1000, Simon Burge wrote:
Have you tried nmh-1.0.3? Works ok for me on Ultrix 4.5.
Huy Le wrote:
Yeah, it fails with nmh-1.0.3 on linux too.
Turns out it seg faults
"Dan Harkless" wrote:
If not the GPL, what other open source license would be most appropriate? X
License? Apache License? BSD License? Artistic License? Others...?
I think if you look at the BSD License template here
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.html, you'll find
that
Jim McMaster wrote:
I finally did get nmh-1.0.2 installed, and the problem with Fcc did not go
away. What am I doing wrong? Here are my "components" files:
To:
cc:
Fcc: +mail_log
Subject:
Try using
Fcc: mail_log
and see if that helps.
-Doug
"Dan Harkless" wrote:
The only modification to VERSION that I think could make sense
(though I still think it is unnecessary) would be to tag it as
'1.0.2-dev' or something similar, with the full '1.0.3' being added
at release, and then immediately modified to '1.0.3-dev' for the
time during
Ruud de Rooij wrote:
Daniel FLIPO [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ This has been fixed in the CVS version. Doug, should we release a
1.0.2 soon, if only to eliminate these recurring compilation
problems? ]
Yes, for that and to get your -group/-cc modification out. I just
need to fix the
I've just uploaded what I think is a stable snapshot of the current
nmh to:
ftp://ftp.mhost.com/pub/nmh/snapshots/nmh-1.0.1-snapshot.19991026.tar.gz
It's in sync with the CVS tree. I think it's ready for nmh-1.0.2, but
there's been enough changes in the way things work and I lack
sufficient
Ruud de Rooij wrote:
The current CVS version uses libtool if available. However, the libtool
that comes with my Linux distribution (Debian GNU/Linux "potato", GNU
libtool 1.3.3) doesn't understand the -static option and the compile fails.
Maybe the check for libtool should be made somewhat more
"Dan Harkless" wrote:
Works fine (as far as I've tested) on 64-bit Suns, too, although I guess
Solaris 2.6 is not a full 64-bit OS.
I plan to test against 2.7 with the Sun 5.0 compilers Real Soon Now.
That should do full 64-bit. Solaris 2.6 is mostly 64-bit, but I'm not
sure which bits.
-Doug
19 matches
Mail list logo
