Ken Hornstein wrote: >Part of my motivation for a "2.0" release is to draw attention back to
I'd say it still only warrants a 1.1. There are insufficient new features added or changed functionality. Leave 2.0 for a major rewrite. I think bumping a version number simply to draw attention to a realease is a bit of a lie. The nmh code is still quite a mess. I'd rather see 2.0 be a nice clean release. Why not kick this out as 1.1.0 (with a 1.1.1 coming soon after with the additional patches from the archives) and instead write up a roadmap of what 2.0 should do? As I said earlier, I'm happy to keep hosting the code. I'll get Ken set up with a cvs account this evening (around midday or morning for you folks in the states). That brings the total of CVS accounts up to 6 at the moment, not counting me, but I'd like to give until January to hear from the remaining folks to say if they still are around. Here's the list of accounts right now: Ken Hornstein Dan Harkless Dan Winship Kimmo Suominen Ruud de Rooij Shantonu Sen The last two are currently active on the list, so unless you say "close my account" I'll leave it. The rest I'll give until 1 January as suggested, and then do an account cleanup (ie: get rid of 'em). -- Doug Morris Morris Communications & Computer Services, Inc. http://www.mhost.com/
