themselves must understand the MH format. I believe UW
has mh support as a legacy, but I haven't spent enough time to get
my own use of it working. Any feedback on IMAP daemons that work with
the MH format.
--
Chad Walstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a.k.a. ^chewie
http://www.wookimus.net
could have used inc to simply split the messages and done a bash for loop to
push each file through procmail, but I hadn't thought of that at the time. ;-)
Regardless, nmh was still a lifesaver.
--
Chad Walstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a.k.a. ^chewie
http://www.wookimus.net
I agree with the ``save 2.0 for the next round of new features''
sentiment. I suggest putting out a release with as many of the bugfixes
as we can get in, then start working on a 2.0 beta with major new
features/interface changes/what-have-you.
chad
complain about it not working as expected. You
can, however, help us debug the code...
$0.02,
--
Chad Walstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a.k.a. ^chewie
http://www.wookimus.net/| s.k.a. gunnarr
Get my public key, ICQ#, etc. $(mailx -s 'get info
question: yes, I believe that the proposed
changes could be nice for mh-e support, but they don't seem very close
to `deployed' to me right now. I'm including Jon Stienhart's message
below.
chad
--- Forwarded Message
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: again - New code
of the time I've seen people try to use separate
branches for radically different versions of softare the results were at
best `confusing'. That said, I'm all for trying it again.. :-)
chad
* The key to using CVS with branching really lies in consistent and
discriptive use of tags, both the branching and standard types.
--
Chad Walstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a.k.a. ^chewie
http://www.wookimus.net/| s.k.a. gunnarr
Get my public key, ICQ#, etc
