Re: nmh status

2002-05-10 Thread Doug Porter
Anders Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have to agree with Ken and Earl. It's high time we get the sourcres under a more stable control. I'd say go for Savannah of sourceforge. I don't really care which, as log as I can get access to it! Could everyone please just settle down? You all

Re: nmh status

2002-05-10 Thread Ken Hornstein
Back around December people got all excited talking about a new release, rolling in patches that are floating around, and taking care of issues in the TODO file, but I have not seen any progress on that front. Until people start to do some real work, moving the repository so that it can just

Re: nmh status

2002-05-10 Thread Doug Porter
Ken Hornstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Listen buddy, I'm going to say it again, SLOWLY this time. Thank you, I so clearly need remediation. I tried. The basic problem was simple: Doug and I couldn't get me working repository access. There was simply some strangeness between our versions

Re: nmh status

2002-05-10 Thread Ken Hornstein
I tried. The basic problem was simple: Doug and I couldn't get me working repository access. There was simply some strangeness between our versions of OpenSSH that made it not work, no matter how much we tried. What version were you running? I see that mononoke.mhost.com is running

Re: nmh status

2002-05-10 Thread Earl Hood
On May 10, 2002 at 12:47, Ken Hornstein wrote: If we are really going to move the CVS repository this should be helpful: URL:http://hackers.progeny.com/~dsp/nmh-cvs.tar.gz I found that on ftp.mhost.com today when I went poking around. I've already got it (thanks to Doug Morris

Re: nmh status

2002-05-10 Thread Ken Hornstein
I've already got it (thanks to Doug Morris for putting it up today!) Now what? ell, _since_ you asked ... I've already submitted it for a project n savannah.gnu.org. By that, I mean that I've created a developer's account for myself and gone through the registration process to host a new

Re: nmh status

2002-05-10 Thread Earl Hood
On May 10, 2002 at 16:04, Ken Hornstein wrote: ell, _since_ you asked ... I've already submitted it for a project n savannah.gnu.org. By that, I mean that I've created a developer's account for myself and gone through the registration process to host a new project. The project managers

Re: nmh status

2002-05-10 Thread Geoff Raye
[Doug Porter] Does anyone have a full archive of nmh-workers and nmh-bugs going back to at least March 17, 2001 (the last commit)? I would like to be able to go through the list archives to look for forgotten patches and any issues that may have been raised. I have tried to get SmartList to

Re: nmh status

2002-05-09 Thread Earl Hood
On May 10, 2002 at 09:44, John Summerfield wrote: Those who prefer Savanna? +1 for Savannah. --ewh

nmh status

2002-05-03 Thread Scott Lipcon
The topic of the status of nmh has come up a few times in the last several months. I'd like to bring it up again, because it doesn't appear that its going anywhere. My motivation is that I've come across a few things I'd like to see fixed in nmh, and I've had some free time recently, so I'm

Re: nmh status

2002-05-03 Thread Scott Lipcon
I agree. I'm willing to create a new CVS repository, and spend the time merging our changes in to mhost if/when we get access to that again. Ruud de Rooij started a project on SourceForge a while ago. http://sourceforge.net/projects/nmh/ Doug Porter posted a few reasons why not to use