A while back, there was a discussion about relative message numbers. For
example,
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2012-10/msg00048.html. But I
don't believe there was a resolution. Was there?
If foobar is a message sequence then something like forbar+3, for the third
message
Date:Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:19:21 -0700
From:n...@dad.org
Message-ID: 201303221519.r2mfjmcf054...@shell0.rawbw.com
| If foobar is a message sequence then something like forbar+3,
| for the third message of foobar, would make my life a bit easier.
Just make new
So it wouldn't be a change to nmh without wide-reaching complications.
As I said earlier this week, I commited the locking code to nmh. David
Levine reported to me that he now gets a 5-second hang when he deletes
a message.
We tracked this down to the fact that his rmmproc calls scan, and given
