Re: [Nmh-workers] Setup help???

2013-05-03 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 03 May 2013 14:54:39 -0700, Bob Carragher said: > Hmm, as in "inc" will do the fetching for me (so that I won't need > to use "fetchmail" anymore)? Oh wow, it does! (It's been a long > time since I read the man page for inc B-) What are the > "limitations" that you hinted at? For

Re: [Nmh-workers] Setup help???

2013-05-03 Thread Bob Carragher
On Fri, 03 May 2013 11:09:14 -0400 Ken Hornstein wrote: > >Then my OS (Ubuntu 10.04) will work. B-) I've avoided building > >my own installs because I got tired of maintaining dependencies, > >the main advantage (for me) of using Ubuntu. (It used to be so > >easy: install GNU, then install X,

[Nmh-workers] Lurkers (Was Re: files created by Fcc header always have mode 0600)

2013-05-03 Thread Bob Carragher
On Fri, 03 May 2013 15:48:33 -0400 Ken Hornstein sez: > First off ... wow, two messages from people I've never seen before within > two days! It's like a nmh renaissance! B-) We're still using (N)MH! Going on 20 years now for me! B-) Bob

Re: [Nmh-workers] send/post busted...

2013-05-03 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Thu, 02 May 2013 21:39:40 -0400, David Levine said: > Thanks. Fix tested and committed. Did a 'git pull', and confirming that it now works both with and without a 'credentials' entry in .mh_profile. pgpPbdERF6wQ5.pgp Description: PGP signature ___

Re: [Nmh-workers] files created by Fcc header always have mode 0600

2013-05-03 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 03 May 2013 15:48:33 -0400, Ken Hornstein said: > Your analysis of the situation is correct; the temporary file is > explicitly chmod'd to 0600 (which seems like the right thing to do). > But it seems to me that perhaps the right thing to do here is have > refile take care of fixing the pe

Re: [Nmh-workers] files created by Fcc header always have mode 0600

2013-05-03 Thread Ken Hornstein
First off ... wow, two messages from people I've never seen before within two days! It's like a nmh renaissance! >Platform: nmh-1.5 on Solaris 10 SPARC > >Is the intended behavior of an Fcc header that >the files it writes always have mode 0600, >regardless of other settings? It looks like ... t

[Nmh-workers] files created by Fcc header always have mode 0600

2013-05-03 Thread Irwin Tillman
Platform: nmh-1.5 on Solaris 10 SPARC Is the intended behavior of an Fcc header that the files it writes always have mode 0600, regardless of other settings? -- When I use comp with an Fcc header, the file written to the Fcc folder always have mode 0600. My umask is 022, and in .mh_profile I ha

Re: [Nmh-workers] Setup help???

2013-05-03 Thread Ken Hornstein
>Then my OS (Ubuntu 10.04) will work. B-) I've avoided building >my own installs because I got tired of maintaining dependencies, >the main advantage (for me) of using Ubuntu. (It used to be so >easy: install GNU, then install X, then install a couple of >"etc." software like MH and emacs. B-)

[Nmh-workers] files created by Fcc header always have mode 0600

2013-05-03 Thread Irwin Tillman
Platform: nmh-1.5 on Solaris 10 SPARC Is the intended behavior of an Fcc header that the files it writes always have mode 0600, regardless of other settings? -- When I use comp with an Fcc header, the file written to the Fcc folder always have mode 0600. My umask is 022, and in .mh_profile I ha

[Nmh-workers] mhshow(1) Suggests moreproc can be used.

2013-05-03 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi, mhshow(1): If a display string is not found, mhshow has several default values: mhshow-show-text/plain: %pmoreproc '%F' mhshow-show-message/rfc822: %pshow -file '%F' That suggests to this reader that one can use `moreproc' in one's own entries, perhaps anywhere in the co

Re: [Nmh-workers] Setup help???

2013-05-03 Thread Bob Carragher
On Thu, 02 May 2013 21:52:08 -0400 Ken Hornstein wrote: > >My apologies! It's version 1.3-1 (pretty ancient, I guess, but > >that's what's tied to my version of Ubuntu -- something else I > >need to update). > > Okay, yeah, that explains a lot. There are some other features > in nmh 1.5 that y