>> Or whatever, and that will be the current folder. You can also push
>> them on the folder stack. If you want them to show up when you do
>> "folders", that's harder.
>
>I don't know what the folder stack is.
Check out folder(1), specifically the -push, -pop, and -list arguments.
Ken Hornstein wrote:
>> I rather wish that NMH would take a "Path" to be...
>> well.. $PATH-like thing, such that I could move folders to an archive
>> machine, with NMH being aware that they are elsewhere.
> You're allowed to give an absolute path as a folder name. E.g., you c
>I rather wish that NMH would take a "Path" to be...
>well.. $PATH-like thing, such that I could move folders to an archive
>machine, with NMH being aware that they are elsewhere.
You're allowed to give an absolute path as a folder name. E.g., you could
do something like:
% scan +/ssw/users/mcr
> I rather wish that NMH would take a "Path" to be... well.. $PATH-like
> thing, such that I could move folders to an archive machine, with NMH
> being aware that they are elsewhere. Ideally, it could be told that
> they are even RO, burnt on DVD or something like that.
Not quite what you want, b
Just FYI, I have...
obiwan-[~](2.6.6) mcr 10003 %folders +outgoing
FOLDER # MESSAGES RANGE ; CUR (OTHERS)
outgoing+ has 2084 messages (1-2094); cur=2084; (others).
outgoing/pgphas 73 messages (1- 73); (others).
outgoing/y2001 has 1287 messages (1
Hi George,
> Its always been my belief that large folders cause multi level
> directory block chaining in traditional UNIX fs.
I expect the majority of nmh users are using ext3 or ext4 filesystems,
as shown by ‘df -T’, though perhaps we have many Apple users who have
something else. I don't thin
>Starting in late 2014 I have stopped deleting messages, putting them in a
>directory, +gone, which now contains 465,147 messages and uses about 17
>gigabytes. The bulk of these messages were of transitory or of less interest
>to me. But they include 1,702 messages from my daughter. They were almos
Its always been my belief that large folders cause multi level directory
block chaining in traditional UNIX fs. This itself incurs costs and
consequences on how the cross-system file buffer cache works. Basically,
any operation which requires all the directory blocks to be walked in
sequence flood
Starting in late 2014 I have stopped deleting messages, putting them in a
directory, +gone, which now contains 465,147 messages and uses about 17
gigabytes. The bulk of these messages were of transitory or of less interest
to me. But they include 1,702 messages from my daughter. They were almost al