Dear Jeroen, Jakob, Philip & all
Many thanks for sharing your insights & responses.
Thanks,
Santosh
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 6:14 PM Philip Harder Delff wrote:
> Hi Santosh,
>
> While this is not a direct answer to your question, you may be
> interested in using NMsim to do the simulation from
Hi Santosh,
While this is not a direct answer to your question, you may be
interested in using NMsim to do the simulation from R. NMsim calls
Nonmem to do the actual simulation so you need Nonmem on the same system
as where you run R. With the recent version 0.1.0 NMsim runs on Windows
as
Hi Santosh,
Yes, with your setup, having EVID=2 records with e.g. DV=“.” for missing: the
$TABLE output would per default include both the EVID=0 (observation) and
EVID=2 (to obtain predictions) records.
So if you output (in table file) IPRED or e.g. CIPREDI, these could contain
predictions
Hi Santosh,
The prediction (PRED/IPRED) is supplied by the $TABLE step for all
records, whether EVID=0 or EVID=2, so I do not understand your question
as such. Perhaps you can share model code and a dataset stub for us to
help you better?
Jeroen
http://pd-value.com
jer...@pd-value.com
Hi,
I am familiar with the classic estimation/simulation methodology, wherein
predicted values (of DV, for example) are obtained after applying
estimation ($ESTIMATION) followed by simulation ($SIMULATION)
Is there a way to use an input NM dataset (having inserted longitudinal
records
