[nodejs] Re: Node v0.12.0 (Stable)

2015-02-07 Thread André Fiedler
Hi, nice to see v0.12.0 production ready, but why no ARM PI (Raspberry Pi) build? greetings Sunny Am Samstag, 7. Februar 2015 10:54:37 UTC+1 schrieb julien...@joyent.com: > > We are excited to announce the availability of Node.js v0.12! It has been a > long process, and we want to thank contri

[nodejs] Re: Node v0.12.0 (Stable)

2015-02-08 Thread William Dauchy
Hi, I think there is a problem with gpg checks: gpg: Signature made Fri Feb 6 23:03:40 2015 CET using RSA key ID 888C628D gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found -- William -- Job board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ New group rules: https://gist.github.com/othiym23/9886289#file-moderat

[nodejs] Re: Node v0.12.0 (Stable)

2015-02-09 Thread William Dauchy
ok this release is signed with a different key 888C628D: Julien Gilli On Sunday, February 8, 2015 at 1:39:45 PM UTC+1, William Dauchy wrote: > > Hi, > > I think there is a problem with gpg checks: > > gpg: Signature made Fri Feb 6 23:03:40 2015 CET using RSA key ID 888C628D > gpg: Can't check s

[nodejs] Re: Node v0.12.0 (Stable)

2015-02-09 Thread julien . gilli
Hi William! On Sunday, February 8, 2015 at 4:39:45 AM UTC-8, William Dauchy wrote: > > I think there is a problem with gpg checks: > > gpg: Signature made Fri Feb 6 23:03:40 2015 CET using RSA key ID 888C628D > gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found > > The files checkums have been sign

[nodejs] Re: Node v0.12.0 (Stable)

2015-02-09 Thread julien . gilli
Hi! On Saturday, February 7, 2015 at 9:20:01 AM UTC-8, André Fiedler wrote: > > nice to see v0.12.0 production ready, but why no ARM PI (Raspberry Pi) > build? > I'm not familiar with the Raspberry Pi platform and what providing binaries for it would require. If I understand correctly, the cur

Re: [nodejs] Re: Node v0.12.0 (Stable)

2015-02-09 Thread Aria Stewart
> On Feb 9, 2015, at 6:02 AM, William Dauchy wrote: > > ok this release is signed with a different key 888C628D: Julien Gilli > Hey Julien -- it might make sense to see if you can get your key signed by the old key, so that the web of trust works. Aria -- Job board: http://jobs.nodejs.or

Re: [nodejs] Re: Node v0.12.0 (Stable)

2015-02-09 Thread julien . gilli
Hi! On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 8:32:08 AM UTC-8, Aria Stewart wrote: > > > > On Feb 9, 2015, at 6:02 AM, William Dauchy wrote: > > > > ok this release is signed with a different key 888C628D: Julien Gilli < > jgi...@fastmail.fm> > > > Hey Julien -- it might make sense to see if you can get

Re: [nodejs] Re: Node v0.12.0 (Stable)

2015-02-09 Thread julien . gilli
On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 10:38:28 AM UTC-8, julien...@joyent.com wrote: > > Hi! > > On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 8:32:08 AM UTC-8, Aria Stewart wrote: >> >> >> > On Feb 9, 2015, at 6:02 AM, William Dauchy wrote: >> > >> > ok this release is signed with a different key 888C628D: Julien

RE: [nodejs] Re: Node v0.12.0 (Stable)

2015-02-09 Thread Will Hoover
@googlegroups.com Subject: [nodejs] Re: Node v0.12.0 (Stable) Hi! On Saturday, February 7, 2015 at 9:20:01 AM UTC-8, André Fiedler wrote: nice to see v0.12.0 production ready, but why no ARM PI (Raspberry Pi) build? I'm not familiar with the Raspberry Pi platform and what providing binaries fo