Maybe you can consider socket.io, which handle most of the things for you.
Here is an example:
http://fbwebsocket.nodester.com/
http://socket.io/
Thanks and Regards,
Sky
Tim Caswell 於 2012/5/28 下午11:41 寫道：
> This is a common problem porting blocking code to node. If you block on
Common Node doesn't block since it uses fibers and there's no need to write
anything C. It's also cross platform thanks to the recent support for
Windows in fibers.
On Monday, May 28, 2012 7:08:34 PM UTC+3, Tim Caswell wrote:
>
> Ok, then it will block your client. But depending on your logic t
Ok, then it will block your client. But depending on your logic that may
be ok. Still node doesn't have a blocking socket primitive, you would have
to implement your own in C.
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Serti Ayoub wrote:
> i use socket as client not as Server.
>
> So i will not have p
i use socket as client not as Server.
So i will not have problem with blocking I/O
2012/5/28 Tim Caswell
> This is a common problem porting blocking code to node. If you block on
> network sockets in node, it will destroy the performance of your server.
> There is only one thread. The serve
This is a common problem porting blocking code to node. If you block on
network sockets in node, it will destroy the performance of your server.
There is only one thread. The server will be unable to serve multiple
connections at once if one is blocking.
Why are you porting this to node? This
>
> as an example of what i have:
>
>>
>> var socket = new SocketSync();
>> socket.open('localhost', 8856);
>> socket.write('my request');
>> var mydata= socket.read();
>> socket.end();
>
>
Check out the "socket" module in Common Node:
https://github.com/olegp/common-node
Here's the canonical ch
Your best bet is possibly to write a wrapper for a wakanda/ssjs socket that
makes it mimic
an asynchronous node.js socket, alternatively, you could do the inverse, but
it's a lot
harder to do.
Or, you could wrap it in promises, which would provide a potentially more
unified interface,
but th
On Sunday, May 27, 2012 12:51:54 PM UTC-7, Serti Ayoub wrote:
>
> so, what can be the solution?
>
Well, I can see two solutions, the first of which you've already dismissed
(switching to async IO), and the second, I couldn't even begin to estimate
the amount of work needed. That would be to w
the project have already be done with wakanda ssjs and it's was done with
synchronous socket, and i you know asynchronous socket it's an other logic,
so that will require major change in my project if i use asynchronous
socket.
2012/5/27 Alan Hoffmeister
> @Serti, if you don't mind about the que
@Serti, if you don't mind about the question, but what would be the
difference for you between sync and async sockets?
--
Att,
Alan Hoffmeister
2012/5/27 Serti Ayoub
> that's not sound good for my case.
>
>
> 2012/5/27 Arnout Kazemier
>
>> Starting a new blocking child process that does the a
that's not sound good for my case.
2012/5/27 Arnout Kazemier
> Starting a new blocking child process that does the async socket
> operation. Shelljs has a method for blocking child process:
> https://github.com/arturadib/shelljs
>
> On Sunday, May 27, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Serti Ayoub wrote:
>
> so,
Starting a new blocking child process that does the async socket operation.
Shelljs has a method for blocking child process:
https://github.com/arturadib/shelljs
On Sunday, May 27, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Serti Ayoub wrote:
> so, what can be the solution?
>
> 2012/5/27 Eric S mailto:e...@geekzilla.or
so, what can be the solution?
2012/5/27 Eric S
>
>
> On Sunday, May 27, 2012 10:26:30 AM UTC-7, Serti Ayoub wrote:
>>
>>
>> What i need a library for using synchronous socket, so i wont to use
>> event such as (on 'data' ).
>>
>
> We understand that. The answer is that it can't be done without
On Sunday, May 27, 2012 10:26:30 AM UTC-7, Serti Ayoub wrote:
>
>
> What i need a library for using synchronous socket, so i wont to use event
> such as (on 'data' ).
>
We understand that. The answer is that it can't be done without making
changes to node itself. What few synchronous functio
>
> Thank's
What i need a library for using synchronous socket, so i wont to use event
such as (on 'data' ).
as an example of what i have:
>
> var socket = new SocketSync();
> socket.open('localhost', 8856);
> socket.write('my request');
> var mydata= socket.read();
> socket.end();
instead of
On May 27, 7:35 am, Serti Ayoub wrote:
> it's my first post in this group, i'm new on nodejs field.
>
> I have done an ssjs code with wakanda server , the code use a
> synchronous socket. i want to use it in nodeJS but i dont find
> synchronous Socket.
You won't find synchronous network I/O in no
16 matches
Mail list logo
