I have a huge JSON file, right, it's 78MB.
When I just require it from node-cli it takes 450MB memory footprint. I can
understand that is bloated 6x times because the JSON file is just a string
in the storage, but it needs spaces for indexing, making some padding,
optimization, linking and what
There may be a better answer for this, but JSON is actually more rigidly
structured than standard JavaScript. So, it makes sense to me that a more
specialized parser would need more memory than just sending JavaScript code to
the VM.
-- Joshua Gross
Christian / SpanDeX, Inc. / BA Candidate of
makes sense. different parser needs more extra spaces. however the spaces
for the parser-only should be freed at gc time, isn't it?
2012년 8월 6일 월요일 오전 5시 31분 3초 UTC+9, Joshua Gross 님의 말:
>
> There may be a better answer for this, but JSON is actually more rigidly
> structured than standard JavaS
You might want to consider using a streaming JSON parser.
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Kei Son wrote:
> I have a huge JSON file, right, it's 78MB.
> When I just require it from node-cli it takes 450MB memory footprint. I
> can understand that is bloated 6x times because the JSON file is just
Thanks for the idea.
But I just want to know why.
2012년 8월 6일 월요일 오전 9시 58분 22초 UTC+9, Marak Squires 님의 말:
>
> You might want to consider using a streaming JSON parser.
>
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Kei Son wrote:
>
>> I have a huge JSON file, right, it's 78MB.
>> When I just require it fro
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Joshua Gross wrote:
> There may be a better answer for this, but JSON is actually more rigidly
> structured than standard JavaScript. So, it makes sense to me that a more
> specialized parser would need more memory than just sending JavaScript code
> to the VM.
Tha
https://github.com/joyent/node/blob/ed7fb149a20ee5e7aa9a0574a242a193d7acd761/lib/module.js#L464
As we can see at #465 and #472, I'm pretty sure that there is no dumb and
buffering things on Node.js side.
Unless there are some magic in the module._compile() as the opposite.
And i totally agree o
