Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

Go to http://66c206288740f1dace19-a0a168060b6833a87dd306ed7eb3f4a7.r15.cf1.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#issuecomment-44618063

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

[jclouds-site-pull-requests #326](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/326/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#issuecomment-44617957

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

@nacx: I've tried to condense some of the language and remove the "mailing list email" feel. Is this better? @everett-toews: Thanks for all the initial reformatting of the Wiki doc! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#issuecommen

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

Go to http://41ce8033744c5cbbbfce-228813b5fe9b30f66134ed50c76d7997.r39.cf1.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#issuecomment-44617365

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

[jclouds-site-pull-requests #325](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/325/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#issuecomment-44617265

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

Go to http://c376f3a377c2f4b43713-2ebf4ae69cd6276a4c4461a58a437b98.r52.cf1.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#issuecomment-44616588

Re: [jclouds] Update glance's endpoint for unit tests (#258)

> Once that is in good shape, this will be needed. :) Thanks for explaining, @sallum! So if I understand correctly, this one can wait until jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack#77 is ready? Will that PR also include test cases to see what happens if the server returns `/v2.0` endpoint URLs, and URLs

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

[jclouds-site-pull-requests #324](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/324/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#issuecomment-44616444

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

Reopened #103. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#event-126295537

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

Closed #103. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#event-126295535

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

Closed #103. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#event-126295272

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

Reopened #103. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#event-126295274

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

[jclouds-site-pull-requests #323](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/323/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#issuecomment-44616340

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

[jclouds-site-pull-requests #322](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/322/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#issuecomment-44616241

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

Closed #103. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#event-126294979

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

Now with an explicit attempt to uninstall Jekyll first... --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#issuecomment-44616209

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

Reopened #103. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#event-126294986

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

[jclouds-site-pull-requests #321](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/321/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#issuecomment-44616115

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

> jclouds-site-pull-requests #320 FAILURE Back to the Jekyll issue? Wiped the workspace and will try again... --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#issuecomment-44616081

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

Reopened #103. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#event-126294497

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

Closed #103. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#event-126294496

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (ctd.) (#103)

[jclouds-site-pull-requests #320](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/320/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103#issuecomment-44616025

[jclouds-site] Core concepts (#103)

Continuation of #101 You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site core-concepts Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/103 -- Commit Summary -- * Core concepts * Moving 'Core C

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (#101)

About to continue this on a new branch (which unfortunately needs a new PR, it seems). --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/101#issuecomment-44615940

Re: [jclouds-site] Core concepts (#101)

Closed #101. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/101#event-126294045

Re: [jclouds] Add pool field to Nova FloatingIP (#385)

+1 - looks good to me. Thanks, @jdaggett! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/385#issuecomment-44614086

Re: [jclouds] Add pool field to Nova FloatingIP (#385)

> jclouds » jclouds #1166 UNSTABLE Unrelated [test failure](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/org.apache.jclouds$jclouds-compute/1166/testReport/junit/org.jclouds.compute.callables/BlockUntilInitScriptStatusIsZeroThenReturnOutputTest/testloopUntilTrueOrThrowCancellationExcep

Re: [jclouds] Remove BlobBuilder and Payloads.calculateMD5 (#381)

> Pushed to master. See [here](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds.git;a=commit;h=186f052022cc1ce611fffb809497e22d8d14). Thanks, @andrewgaul! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/381#issuecomment-44613995

Re: [jclouds] Provide type-safe HashCode methods for Content-MD5 (#384)

> jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #1313 SUCCESS Some new [Checkstyle violations](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1313/violations/). Only one non-minor question from me: worth adding a `HashCode`-accepting variant of the `BaseImmutableContentMetadata` constructor?

Re: [jclouds] Provide type-safe HashCode methods for Content-MD5 (#384)

> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ public BaseImmutableContentMetadata(String contentType, > Long contentLength, byte > String contentDisposition, String contentLanguage, String > contentEncoding, Date expires) { >this.contentType = contentType; >this.contentLength = contentLength;

Re: [jclouds] Provide type-safe HashCode methods for Content-MD5 (#384)

> @@ -83,7 +84,8 @@ public ContentMetadataBuilder expires(@Nullable Date > expires) { > } > > public ContentMetadata build() { > - return new BaseImmutableContentMetadata(contentType, contentLength, > contentMD5, contentDisposition, > + return new BaseImmutableContentMetadata(

Re: [jclouds] Provide type-safe HashCode methods for Content-MD5 (#384)

> > + public ContentMetadataBuilder contentMD5(HashCode contentMD5) { > + this.contentMD5 = contentMD5; Small change here? With this code, a `null` byte (or HashCode) input will cause `this.contentMD5 = null;` to be invoked. In the previous version, a `null` input would cause nothing to

Re: [jclouds] Provide type-safe HashCode methods for Content-MD5 (#384)

>@Override >public PayloadBlobBuilder contentMD5(byte[] md5) { > + return contentMD5(md5 == null ? null : HashCode.fromBytes(md5)); > + } > + > + @Override > + public PayloadBlobBuilder contentMD5(HashCode md5) { Do we want to accept a `null` input here? If s

Re: [jclouds] Provide type-safe HashCode methods for Content-MD5 (#384)

> jclouds-pull-requests #841 FAILURE Some internal Jenkins error. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/384#issuecomment-44613295

Re: [jclouds] openstack console (#339)

> + } > + > + /** > + * Used from jclouds builtin deserializer. > + */ > + public static Type fromValue(String type) { > + if (type != null) { > + for (Type value : Type.values()) { > +if (type.equals(value.type)) { > +

Re: [jclouds] openstack console (#339)

> jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #1314 SUCCESS One new [Checkstyle violation](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1314/org.apache.jclouds.api$openstack-nova/violations/) here. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/p

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-578) Custom HTTP Headers in Rackspace SwiftObjects are ignored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-578: Labels: rackspace swift (was: rackspace) > Custom HTTP Headers in Rackspace SwiftObjects are igno

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-578) Custom HTTP Headers in Rackspace SwiftObjects are ignored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14013224#comment-14013224 ] Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-578: - I believe we should add another setter and get

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-578) Custom HTTP Headers in Rackspace SwiftObjects are ignored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-578: Description: Rackspace allows users to set custom HTTP Headers on their files that are being serv

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-578) Custom HTTP Headers in Rackspace SwiftObjects are ignored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-578: Description: Rackspace allows users to set custom HTTP Headers on their files that are being serv

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-578) Custom HTTP Headers in Rackspace SwiftObjects are ignored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14013225#comment-14013225 ] Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-578: - [~jdaggett] This issue tracks the older swift

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-578) Custom HTTP Headers in Rackspace SwiftObjects are ignored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daren Klamer updated JCLOUDS-578: - Description: Rackspace allows users to set custom HTTP Headers on their files that are being se

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-578) Custom HTTP Headers in Rackspace SwiftObjects are ignored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daren Klamer updated JCLOUDS-578: - Description: Rackspace allows users to set custom HTTP Headers on their files that are being se

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-578) Custom HTTP Headers in Rackspace SwiftObjects are ignored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daren Klamer updated JCLOUDS-578: - Description: Rackspace allows users to set custom HTTP Headers on their files that are being se

[jira] [Created] (JCLOUDS-578) Custom HTTP Headers in Rackspace SwiftObjects are ignored

Daren Klamer created JCLOUDS-578: Summary: Custom HTTP Headers in Rackspace SwiftObjects are ignored Key: JCLOUDS-578 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-578 Project: jclouds

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-577) jclouds-cli blobstore container-list only lists the first 10K containers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14013138#comment-14013138 ] rahul ruikar commented on JCLOUDS-577: -- As per open stack docs, there should be mult

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-577) jclouds-cli blobstore container-list only lists the first 10K containers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14012904#comment-14012904 ] Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-577: - [~jdaggett] The Swift API supports listing mor

Re: [jclouds] Add pool field to Nova FloatingIP (#385)

[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #1315](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1315/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/385#issuecomment-44577452

Re: [jclouds] Add pool field to Nova FloatingIP (#385)

[jclouds-pull-requests #844](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/844/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/385#issuecomment-44576795

Re: [jclouds] Add pool field to Nova FloatingIP (#385)

[jclouds » jclouds #1166](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1166/) UNSTABLE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jcl

Jenkins build became unstable: jclouds » jclouds #1166

See

[jclouds] Add pool field to Nova FloatingIP (#385)

This PR adds the missing pool field to the FloatingIP domain object and updates relevant tests. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-471 You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/rackspace/jclouds floating-ips Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-577) jclouds-cli blobstore container-list only lists the first 10K containers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14012747#comment-14012747 ] Jeremy Daggett commented on JCLOUDS-577: I don't believe this is a bug, based on

Re: [jclouds] openstack console (#339)

[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #1314](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1314/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/339#issuecomment-44569868

Re: [jclouds] openstack console (#339)

[jclouds-pull-requests #843](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/843/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/339#issuecomment-44569346

[jira] [Assigned] (JCLOUDS-471) FloatingIPApi.create() does not work, pool needed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeremy Daggett reassigned JCLOUDS-471: -- Assignee: Jeremy Daggett > FloatingIPApi.create() does not work, pool needed > ---

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds-karaf #992

See -- [...truncated 506 lines...] Downloaded: http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/jclouds/driver/jclouds-slf4j/1.8.0-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml (2 KB at 3.8 KB/sec) Downlo

Re: [jclouds] Provide type-safe HashCode methods for Content-MD5 (#384)

@andrewgaul Thanks for adding the javadoc! +1 --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/384#issuecomment-44569163

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds-chef #1021

See -- [...truncated 25 lines...] [WARNING] It is highly recommended to fix these problems because they threaten the stability of your build. [WARNING] [WARNING] For this reason, future M

Re: [jclouds] openstack console (#339)

[jclouds » jclouds #1165](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1165/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/339#issuecomme

Re: [jclouds] openstack console (#339)

> + > .endpoint("https://az-1.region-a.geo-1.compute.hpcloudsvc.com/v1.1/3456/"; > + + "servers/" + serverId + "/action") > + .build(); > + > + HttpResponse getConsoleResponse = > HttpResponse.builder().statusCode(200) > + .message("HTTP/1.1 200 OK") > +

Re: [jclouds] openstack console (#339)

> + > .endpoint("https://az-1.region-a.geo-1.compute.hpcloudsvc.com/v1.1/3456/"; > + + "servers/" + serverId + "/action") > + .build(); > + > + HttpResponse getConsoleResponse = > HttpResponse.builder().statusCode(200) > + .message("HTTP/1.1 200 OK") > +

Re: [jclouds] openstack console (#339)

> + private final String type; > + > + Type(String type) { > + this.type = type; > + } > + > + public String type() { > + return type; > + } > + > + /** > + * Used from jclouds builtin deserializer. > + */ > + public static Type fromVal

Re: [jclouds] openstack console (#339)

> + private final String type; > + > + Type(String type) { > + this.type = type; > + } > + > + public String type() { > + return type; > + } > + > + /** > + * Used from jclouds builtin deserializer. > + */ > + public static Type fromVal

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-575) Support multiple ranges in getBlob

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14012439#comment-14012439 ] Michael Pavlovsky commented on JCLOUDS-575: --- I would like to fix it today and s

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds-karaf #991

See -- [...truncated 747 lines...] [INFO] Rat check: Summary of files. Unapproved: 0 unknown: 0 generated: 0 approved: 10 licence. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.5.1:install (de

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-569 : Storage for jobs is changed to list of maps (#67)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs #1102](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1102/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pul

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-569 : Storage for jobs is changed to list of maps (#67)

[jclouds-labs-pull-requests #167](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/167/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/67#issuecomment-44526754

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds-karaf #990

See -- [...truncated 747 lines...] [INFO] Rat check: Summary of files. Unapproved: 0 unknown: 0 generated: 0 approved: 10 licence. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.5.1:install (de

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-569 : Storage for jobs is changed to list of maps (#67)

[jclouds-labs-pull-requests #166](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/166/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/67#issuecomment-44526304

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-569 : Storage for jobs is changed to list of maps (#67)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs #1101](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1101/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pul

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds » jclouds-labs #1101

See

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-569 : Storage for jobs is changed to list of maps (#67)

Thanks for your first contribution @rahulruikar! There is a build failure: [ERROR] /scratch/jenkins/workspace/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/cloudsigma2/src/test/java/org/jclouds/cloudsigma2/functions/DriveToJsonTest.java:[72,13] jobs(java.util.List>) in org.jclouds.cloudsigma2.domain.Drive

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds-labs #1100

See Changes: [rahul.ruikar] Create rahulruikar [rahul.ruikar] JCLOUDS-569 : Storage for jobs is list of maps [rahul.ruikar] Delete rahulruikar -- [...truncated 1402 lines...] [IN

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-569 : Storage for jobs is changed to list of maps (#67)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs #1100](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1100/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/j

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-569 : Storage for jobs is changed to list of maps (#67)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs #1099](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1099/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/j

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds-labs #1099

See Changes: [rahul.ruikar] Create rahulruikar [rahul.ruikar] JCLOUDS-569 : Storage for jobs is list of maps [rahul.ruikar] Delete rahulruikar -- [...truncated 1408 lines...] [IN

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-569 : Storage for jobs is changed to list of maps (#67)

[jclouds-labs-pull-requests #165](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/165/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/67#issuecomment-44516460

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-569 : Storage for jobs is changed to list of maps (#67)

[jclouds-labs-pull-requests #164](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/164/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/67#issuecomment-44516451

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-569 : Storage for jobs is changed to list of maps (#67)

Reopened #67. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/67#event-125924268

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-569 : Storage for jobs is changed to list of maps (#67)

Closed #67. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/67#event-125924225

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds-labs #1098

See Changes: [rahul.ruikar] Create rahulruikar [rahul.ruikar] JCLOUDS-569 : Storage for jobs is list of maps -- GitHub pull request #67 to jclouds/jclouds-labs Building remotely o

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-569 : Storage for jobs is changed to list of maps (#67)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs #1098](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1098/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/j

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-569 : Storage for jobs is changed to list of maps (#67)

[jclouds-labs-pull-requests #163](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/163/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/67#issuecomment-44513195

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-569) Cloudsigma listDrivesInfo() and getDriveInfo () parse error when jobs are present

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14012211#comment-14012211 ] rahul ruikar commented on JCLOUDS-569: -- Link to pull request https://github.com/jclo

[jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-569 : Storage for jobs is changed to list of maps (#67)

JCLOUDS-569 : Cloudsigma listDrivesInfo() and getDriveInfo () parse error when jobs are present Jobs fields from DriveInfo stored in "list of maps" You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/rahulruikar/jclouds-labs master Or you can view, comment on it, or merge

Re: [jclouds] Provide type-safe HashCode methods for Content-MD5 (#384)

[jclouds-pull-requests #841](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/841/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/384#issuecomment-44502575