Openstack nova list IP pools
extension api
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/inbarsto/cloudband-jclouds ListIPPools
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/570
-- Commit Summary --
* Openstack
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6
#193](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/193/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/570#issuecomment-58775503
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1282](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1282/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/570#issuecomment-58775922
[jclouds » jclouds
#1780](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1780/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1457/
--
[...truncated 264 lines...]
[INFO] Exclude: **/LICENSE.txt
[INFO] Exclude: **/header.txt
[INFO] Exclude: **/NOTICE.txt
[INFO] Exclude: **/DISCLAIMER
[INFO] Exclude:
merged into master
Thanks, @adriancole!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/90#issuecomment-58802856
+import org.jclouds.openstack.nova.v2_0.internal.BaseNovaApiLiveTest;
+import org.testng.annotations.Test;
+
+import java.util.Set;
+
+import static org.testng.Assert.assertTrue;
+
+/**
+ * Tests for link {@code FloatingIPPoolApi}
+ */
+@Test(groups = live, testName =
Thanks, @inbarsto! There are some minors such as test names not matching the
class etc. that we can take care of during the merge and don't need to worry
about for now.
Quick question about the background to this PR: do you have users using the API
at present?
---
Reply to this email directly
@@ -65,8 +65,7 @@
timeoutMillis = timeoutMillis.or(defaultMillis);
} else {
// TODO: remove old logic once Named annotations are on all methods
[minor] Does the TODO here and below still make sense, or can we remove that
too?
---
Reply to this email directly or
+1 - looks good to me. One minor comment we can, if relevant, take care of
during the merge.
Thanks, @adriancole!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/569#issuecomment-58803716
this PR is actually old code when we used nova networks but since i saw many
question regarding people having problems with nova networks and ip's so i
decided to help out :)
I will fix the comments hope to get it ready tomorrow morning (14 hrs from now)
btw (since I have your attention
@@ -445,8 +355,66 @@ public void suspendNode(String id) {
api.getVirtualGuestApi().pauseVirtualGuest(Long.parseLong(id));
}
- private boolean isOperatingSystem(SoftwareDescription input) {
- return input.getOperatingSystem() == 1;
+ /**
+* This method will
@@ -445,8 +355,66 @@ public void suspendNode(String id) {
api.getVirtualGuestApi().pauseVirtualGuest(Long.parseLong(id));
}
- private boolean isOperatingSystem(SoftwareDescription input) {
- return input.getOperatingSystem() == 1;
+ /**
+* This method will
+ });
+ if (!optionalBootableVolume.isPresent()) {
+ return Type.LOCAL.ordinal();
+ }
+ return optionalBootableVolume.get().getType().ordinal();
+ }
+
+ private OptionalOperatingSystem tryExtractOperatingSystemFrom(final
String imageId) {
+
+ private static class IsBootableDevice implements
PredicateVirtualGuestBlockDeviceTemplate {
+ @Override
+ public boolean apply(VirtualGuestBlockDeviceTemplate
blockDeviceTemplate) {
+ return blockDeviceTemplate.getDevice().equals(BOOTABLE_DEVICE);
+ }
+ }
+
+ .filter(new PredicateOperatingSystem() {
+ @Override
+ public boolean apply(OperatingSystem input) {
+return input.getId().contains(imageId);
+ }
+ }), Predicates.notNull());
+ }
+
+
+ private final String osReferenceCode;
+
+ public HasSameOsReferenceCode(String osReferenceCode) {
+ this.osReferenceCode = osReferenceCode;
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public boolean apply(SoftwareDescription input) {
+ return
@@ -67,15 +67,18 @@ public void testLaunchClusterWithMinDisk() throws
RunNodesException {
TemplateBuilder templateBuilder =
context.getComputeService().templateBuilder();
templateBuilder.imageId(CENTOS_6_64);
+ //templateBuilder.imageVersionMatches(6.5);
Here and
Thanks for this, @andreaturli! Most of my comments we can take care of during
merging, I guess the main one is whether we can create singletons for the
various new transformation functions this PR adds.
For background: could you explain what the motivation for the PR is? Is private
image
+
+ private static class ConcreteBuilder extends BuilderConcreteBuilder {
+ @Override
+ protected ConcreteBuilder self() {
+ return this;
+ }
+ }
+
+ private final Boolean available;
+
+ @ConstructorProperties({available})
+ protected ZoneState(Boolean
@inbarsto Just a logic question about a domain object accessor. No need for
another commit on your side, just to confirm that things are indeed correct
as-is. I'll take care of @adriancole's comment during the merge.
Thanks for living through this one!!
---
Reply to this email directly or view
@ConstructorProperties({
- id, volume_id, status, size, created_at, display_name,
display_description
+ id, volume_id, status, size, created_at, display_name,
display_description, os-extended-snapshot-attributes:project_id
@jdaggett Ping about @inbarsto's response..?
---
@@ -39,6 +40,10 @@
@Test(groups = live, testName = ImageApiLiveTest)
public class ImageApiLiveTest extends BaseGlanceApiLiveTest {
+ private static final int TWO_MINUTES = 120;
+ private static final int FIVE_SECONDS = 5;
+ public static final String IMAGE_NAME =
all of them are fixed post review can you maybe have a look
Ha! You got me! ;-)
* for 560, I just had one logic question about an accessor - if you can confirm
whether that's OK I'll take care of the remaining comments during the merge
* for 562, I've pinged @jdaggett to see if he has a
+ public void testCreateImageCopyFromLocation() {
+ StringPayload imageData = new StringPayload();
+ for (String region : api.getConfiguredZones()) {
+ ImageApi imageApi = api.getImageApiForZone(region);
+ ImageDetails details = imageApi.create(jclouds-live-test,
Fixes / response in 2 hours
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/570#issuecomment-58805773
@@ -65,8 +65,7 @@
timeoutMillis = timeoutMillis.or(defaultMillis);
} else {
// TODO: remove old logic once Named annotations are on all methods
Sadly, all methods don't currently contain Named. This is one of the
reasons I suggest we use error-prone to help us be
@@ -65,8 +65,7 @@
timeoutMillis = timeoutMillis.or(defaultMillis);
} else {
// TODO: remove old logic once Named annotations are on all methods
added an issue about this with context about why I hadn't initially
just added it to the build.
Adrian Cole created JCLOUDS-752:
---
Summary: Add error-prone to the build and create bug patterns for
known bugs or anti-patterns.
Key: JCLOUDS-752
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-752
@@ -65,8 +65,7 @@
timeoutMillis = timeoutMillis.or(defaultMillis);
} else {
// TODO: remove old logic once Named annotations are on all methods
added an issue about this with context
Thanks!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-40?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14168697#comment-14168697
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-40:
Commit
merged to master, can cherry-pick to 1.8.x after 1.8.1 is out
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/569#issuecomment-58806789
Closed #569.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/569#event-177390508
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14168700#comment-14168700
]
Andrew Phillips commented on JCLOUDS-752:
-
If we have any initial apprehensions
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google/260/
--
[...truncated 2949 lines...]
[INFO] Exclude: **/README.txt
[INFO] Exclude: **/DEPENDENCIES
[INFO] Exclude: **/CONTRIBUTING.md
[INFO] Exclude: **/*json
[INFO] Exclude: **/*readme
[INFO]
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google/org.apache.jclouds.labs$google-compute-engine/260/
--
[INFO]
[INFO]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14168721#comment-14168721
]
Adrian Cole commented on JCLOUDS-747:
-
FYI, not saying we take action on this, but
+
+ private static class ConcreteBuilder extends BuilderConcreteBuilder {
+ @Override
+ protected ConcreteBuilder self() {
+ return this;
+ }
+ }
+
+ private final Boolean available;
+
+ @ConstructorProperties({available})
+ protected ZoneState(Boolean
it was hmm... an experience :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/560#issuecomment-58809845
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6
#194](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/194/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/570#issuecomment-58810230
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/720/
--
[...truncated 133 lines...]
Downloading:
https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/jclouds/jclouds-compute/2.0.0-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml
Downloading:
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6
#195](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/195/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/570#issuecomment-58810300
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6
#196](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/196/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/570#issuecomment-58810636
fixed live test and expect test name
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/570#issuecomment-58810629
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1458/
--
[...truncated 314 lines...]
[INFO] Exclude: **/TAGS
[INFO] Exclude: **/.metadata/**
[INFO] Exclude: **/atlassian-ide-plugin.xml
[INFO] Exclude: **/.DS_Store
[INFO] Exclude:
it was hmm... an experience
*grin*. Hopefully, an experience that changes things for the better - not just
for you, but for all contributors. So we **all** have something to be grateful
to you for ;-)
This patch is against 1.8.x - is that intentional? If so, we can merge it after
1.8.1 is
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1283](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1283/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/570#issuecomment-58811756
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1285](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1285/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/570#issuecomment-58812042
[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack
#1842](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1842/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
See
https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1842/changes
Changes:
[inbar.stolberg] openstack glance added option copy from to create image
--
GitHub pull request #162 to jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack
Building remotely on
fixed the test/s :grin:
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/162#issuecomment-58812856
[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests
#464](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/464/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
grin. Hopefully, an experience that changes things for the better - not just
for you, but for all contributors. So we all have something to be grateful to
you for ;-)
you guys are awesome jclouds community is gr8 :)
it is for 1.8 i'll be happy if it will land there and in master as well
if
cloudbees having problems, i don't believe they are this PR related...
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/162#issuecomment-58813374
[jclouds-karaf-pull-requests
#90](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-pull-requests/90/)
ABORTED
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/56#issuecomment-58813409
[jclouds » jclouds
#1782](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1782/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
See
https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1843/
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1459/
--
[...truncated 267 lines...]
[INFO] Exclude: **/README.txt
[INFO] Exclude: **/DEPENDENCIES
[INFO] Exclude: **/CONTRIBUTING.md
[INFO] Exclude: **/*json
[INFO] Exclude: **/*readme
[jclouds-karaf-pull-requests
#91](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-pull-requests/91/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/56#issuecomment-58814933
Hi @devcsrj!
Thanks for sticking with this for so long! I'd briefly like to step back from
the code for a second and get a better understanding of the background to the
PR:
* are you adding this based on user demand, or to provide a Java client, or for
some other reason?
* do you know what
Hi @timur87!
Thanks for sticking with this for so long! I'd briefly like to step back from
the code for a second and get a better understanding of the background to the
PR:
* are you adding this based on user demand, or to provide a Java client, or for
some other reason?
* do you know what
Looking at this file after the rearrangement, it's clear that this is totally
out of sync with [the Karaf feature
POM](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/blob/master/feature/pom.xml#L107-L162).
That may be intentional and OK, but I suspect not.
@iocanel @ccustine Could either of you shed
Closed #570.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/570#event-177408839
Committed to
[master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds.git;a=commit;h=6b83679ca4058455ea5cd05ecbe9f67fa75fc74a)
Yayayyayaay!!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/570#issuecomment-58816691
@inbarsto Please check if this modified version of the original test makes
sense. The idea is that `regions` can be [limited to a single
i don't believe they are this PR related...
You're right - they're related to the ongoing 1.8.1 release (1.8.x is currently
pointing to a not-yet-published 1.8.1 parent POM).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14168758#comment-14168758
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-692:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14168760#comment-14168760
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-735:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14168759#comment-14168759
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-742:
-
Commit
Thanks :) :+1:
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/570#issuecomment-58817814
[jclouds » jclouds
#1783](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1783/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds » jclouds-karaf
#1329](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-karaf/1329/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Good to go?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/162#issuecomment-58818196
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1460/
--
[...truncated 264 lines...]
[INFO] Exclude: **/LICENSE.txt
[INFO] Exclude: **/header.txt
[INFO] Exclude: **/NOTICE.txt
[INFO] Exclude: **/DISCLAIMER
[INFO] Exclude:
[jclouds » jclouds
#1784](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1784/) FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1784/
--
GitHub pull request #570 to jclouds/jclouds
Building remotely on s-7f29 in workspace
https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/ws/
Fetching changes from the remote Git
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google/261/
--
[...truncated 2949 lines...]
[INFO] Exclude: **/README.txt
[INFO] Exclude: **/DEPENDENCIES
[INFO] Exclude: **/CONTRIBUTING.md
[INFO] Exclude: **/*json
[INFO] Exclude: **/*readme
[INFO]
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google/org.apache.jclouds.labs$google-compute-engine/261/
--
[INFO]
[INFO]
Good to go?
Waiting for 1.8.1 (the 1.8.x branch is frozen right now). Just about to push a
PR for master...
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/162#issuecomment-58819020
[jclouds-karaf-pull-requests
#92](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-pull-requests/92/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/56#issuecomment-58819291
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/502/
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/org.apache.jclouds.labs$rackspace-cloudfiles/502/
Pushed this rebase because I was getting local test failures. Just want to
verify before merging.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/56#issuecomment-58819668
master version of https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/162
/cc @inbarsto
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack add-copyimage
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/721/
[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests
#465](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/465/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack
#1845](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1845/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@@ -217,6 +245,14 @@ public int getToPort() {
return cidrBlocks;
}
+ /**
+* source of traffic is a all but this exclusionCidrBlocks
Yes!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/567/files#r18749888
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1785/changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14168779#comment-14168779
]
Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-752:
-
I am actually not opposed to error-prone -- I
@@ -173,6 +173,54 @@ public void testRemoveIpPermission() {
}
@Test(groups = { integration, live }, singleThreaded = true,
dependsOnMethods = testRemoveIpPermission)
+ public void testAddIpPermissionWithCidrExclusionGroup() {
+ skipIfSecurityGroupsNotSupported();
+
+
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1461/
--
[...truncated 267 lines...]
[INFO] Exclude: **/README.txt
[INFO] Exclude: **/DEPENDENCIES
[INFO] Exclude: **/CONTRIBUTING.md
[INFO] Exclude: **/*json
[INFO] Exclude: **/*readme
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14168780#comment-14168780
]
Adrian Cole commented on JCLOUDS-752:
-
[~gaul] have you raised an issue on The way it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14168780#comment-14168780
]
Adrian Cole edited comment on JCLOUDS-752 at 10/12/14 8:35 PM:
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google/262/changes
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google/org.apache.jclouds.labs$google-compute-engine/262/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14168780#comment-14168780
]
Adrian Cole edited comment on JCLOUDS-752 at 10/12/14 8:36 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14168781#comment-14168781
]
Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-752:
-
I experience these symptoms with 1.8.0_20:
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/andrewgaul/jclouds error-prone-guice
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/571
-- Commit Summary --
* Fix GuiceAssistedInjectScoping error-prone warning
--
I believe this is correct but would appreciate feedback from someone more
experienced with Guice.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/571#issuecomment-58821953
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
