Re: [jclouds-labs] Profitbricks REST - Volume API (#233)

Hmm. Unfortunately, this branch needs to be rebased and squashed, such that it contains one commit with changes only related to this PR. You'll notice that old files, such as [this](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/233/files#diff-5f712604f84e8ddc5e1fb9ca7f759697R51) no longer exists

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-1002] provide access to Docker container Config object in the Node template options (#240)

I think it gives a better control on the container spec and it is a semplification of the options as well. I agree with @nacx - *TemplateOptions couple with low-level features offered by the specific cloud so they dont need to be portable. @gkrvlt any other thoughts? --- Reply to this email dir

[jclouds-labs] Profitbricks REST - Image API (#241)

@jasminSPC You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/241 -- Commit Summary -- * Implemented Server Api * Implemented Volume API * upstream merge * Implemented DataCenter Api * Implemented Server Api * Implemented Vo

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-1046] Remove h2-jdbc provider from source tree (#236)

When I implemented this api last summer, I had two requirements: 1. The api had to be independent from the actual database engine. 2. The blobs had to be stored in the database. Since blob operations are usually not standard in SQL, the only sane way to meet these requirements was to add and obje

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-1002] provide access to Docker container Config object in the Node template options (#240)

I tried also the way witha new template options class, but I've failed on `TemplateBuilderImpl.build()` which copies properties to new instance of the old options class. So I've put the `Config.Builder` member variable to the old class (`DockerTemplateOptions`) at the end. --- Reply to this ema

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1002) Docker: Make the whole container Config object configurable by user

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15157247#comment-15157247 ] Josef Cacek commented on JCLOUDS-1002: -- PR sent: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds

[jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-1002] provide access to Docker container Config object in the Node template options (#240)

JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1002 Provide fine-grained control of container configuration to `DockerTemplateOptions`. If the `configBuilder` is set, then it's used and other members introduced in `DockerTemplateOptions` are ignored. You can view, comment on, or merge this

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-1046] Remove h2-jdbc provider from source tree (#236)

@andrewgaul @rcoedo any thoughts on this? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/236#issuecomment-187252235

[jira] [Resolved] (JCLOUDS-1084) SshToCustomPortLiveTest in Docker provider fails because of problem with downloading SSH

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ignasi Barrera resolved JCLOUDS-1084. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 > SshToCustomPortLiveTest in Docker provid

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-1084) SshToCustomPortLiveTest in Docker provider fails because of problem with downloading SSH

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1084: Affects Version/s: 1.9.2 > SshToCustomPortLiveTest in Docker provider fails because of pro

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-1084] Docker live tests fixed and made more robust (#237)

Closed #237. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/237#event-559902771

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-1084] Docker live tests fixed and made more robust (#237)

Pushed to master as [8e142cd2](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/8e142cd2). Thanks @kwart! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/237#issuecomment-187251229

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1084) SshToCustomPortLiveTest in Docker provider fails because of problem with downloading SSH

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15157223#comment-15157223 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-1084: -- Com

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-1046] Put h2-jdbc provider as a module to the jclouds-labs parent pom (#236)

The new commit removes the `h2-jdbc` provider from the source tree. >From IRC discussion on 2016-02-22: > \ nacx, BTW, do you have any idea what to do with failing h2-jdbc > module? https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/236 > \ jcacek, I'd suggest just to remove that provider from jclouds

Re: [jclouds-labs] Profitbricks REST - Volume API (#233)

So I merged the upstream. However if I squash it as well, the conflict with the upstream will arise again. So I've left it be for now. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/233#issuecomment-187187622

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-guava-guice-compat » 19.0-rc1,4.0,OpenJDK 7 (latest) #111

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-guava-guice-compat » 19.0-rc1,3.0,OpenJDK 7 (latest) #111

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-guava-guice-compat » 17.0,3.0,OpenJDK 7 (latest) #111

See

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-guava-guice-compat » 18.0,4.0,OpenJDK 7 (latest) #111

See Changes: [devcsrj] Update profitbricks readme to reflect previous refactoring changes -- [...truncated 5430 l

[jira] [Closed] (JCLOUDS-1086) Thoughts on an Artifactory provider

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ignasi Barrera closed JCLOUDS-1086. --- Resolution: Won't Fix > Thoughts on an Artifactory provider > --

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1086) Thoughts on an Artifactory provider

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15156871#comment-15156871 ] Christopher Dancy commented on JCLOUDS-1086: I completely get it and agree.

Re: [jclouds] Swift container JSON requests and null checks (#923)

The code itself lgtm, but I'n not the OpenStack expert here to evaluate if the functional change to nullable values is ok. @zack-shoylev wdyt? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/923#issuecomment-187115477

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1086) Thoughts on an Artifactory provider

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15156741#comment-15156741 ] Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1086: - Just to be clear: we really appreciat