Tomi Ollila writes:
> how bad does out-of-tree build break with this -- do we need to do
> the same as with ruby bindings (copy sources -- do we still do so)? or does
> python provide better alternative..?
Good question. What is here will break with out of tree builds, just
from trivial things
On Mon, Nov 04 2019, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>
> as for checking pytest existence, the following works somewhat:
>
>~/test-venv/bin/python3 -m pytest --version
>
> It prints the version, then exists. Could not figure out how to request
> specific version in quick look (10 min search/trial/error
On Sun, Nov 03 2019, David Bremner wrote:
> The entire python-cffi test suite is considered as a single test at
> the level of the notmuch test suite. This might or might not be ideal,
> but it gets them run.
> ---
> test/T391-python-cffi.sh | 12
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
On Sun, Nov 03 2019, David Bremner wrote:
> Put the build product (and tests) in a well known location so that we
> can find them e.g. from the tests.
> ---
> Makefile.local | 2 +-
> bindings/Makefile.local | 9 +
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff
On Sun, Nov 03 2019, David Bremner wrote:
> This is needed to build the new python bindings
> ---
> configure | 15 +++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/configure b/configure
> index 3c148e12..300591fe 100755
> --- a/configure
> +++ b/configure
> @@ -671,6 +671,15
Tomi Ollila writes:
> On Sun, Nov 03 2019, David Bremner wrote:
>
>> The entire python-cffi test suite is considered as a single test at
>> the level of the notmuch test suite. This might or might not be ideal,
>> but it gets them run.
>
> IMO this is good enough approach -- provided that pytest
On Sun, Nov 03 2019, David Bremner wrote:
> The entire python-cffi test suite is considered as a single test at
> the level of the notmuch test suite. This might or might not be ideal,
> but it gets them run.
IMO this is good enough approach -- provided that pytest is prereq
for this test to be
David Bremner writes:
> This series is on top of a slightly modified version [1] of
>
> id:20191008210312.20685-2-f...@devork.be
>
> If you want to try out the new bindings, you can try the branch wip/cffi in
> the repo
> https://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch
>
> One current annoyance is
Tristan Cacqueray writes:
>> Hmm I'm on 9.2.3 for the time being, and there appears to be no change
>> to anything named `notmuch` between 9.2.3 and 9.2.6.
>>
>> Is the change you're talking of unreleased yet?
>
> Indeed the change isn't actually released, the rename happened in:
>
>
Hi,
I just checked out the wip/cffi branch on git.notmuch.org with the
purpose of porting Lieer (https://github.com/gauteh/lieer). There
seems to be some missing functionality: `Database.get_directory()`
specifically. I also ran into a couple of warning when building
(included below).
Thanks for
10 matches
Mail list logo
