[PATCH v3 0/5] rst2man.py support and doc-build cleanups

2014-07-21 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Sun, Jul 13 2014, "W. Trevor King" wrote: > On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 09:05:41AM +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote: >> I am satisfied with rst-man2any.py, but as being normal picky me I >> wonder whether the command prefix 'rst-' is being too generic >> i.e. is invading that "namespace". If no one else

Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] rst2man.py support and doc-build cleanups

2014-07-20 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Sun, Jul 13 2014, W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote: On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 09:05:41AM +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote: I am satisfied with rst-man2any.py, but as being normal picky me I wonder whether the command prefix 'rst-' is being too generic i.e. is invading that namespace. If no one

[PATCH v3 0/5] rst2man.py support and doc-build cleanups

2014-07-13 Thread W. Trevor King
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 09:05:41AM +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote: > I am satisfied with rst-man2any.py, but as being normal picky me I > wonder whether the command prefix 'rst-' is being too generic > i.e. is invading that "namespace". If no one else has the same > feeling (or the feeling is just wrong

[PATCH v3 0/5] rst2man.py support and doc-build cleanups

2014-07-13 Thread David Bremner
Tomi Ollila writes: > > The series now looks good to me, I don't have time to test it now but will > do it after Jul 20th. > > I am satisfied with rst-man2any.py, but as being normal picky me I wonder > whether the command prefix 'rst-' is being too generic i.e. is invading > that "namespace". If

Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] rst2man.py support and doc-build cleanups

2014-07-13 Thread David Bremner
Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi writes: The series now looks good to me, I don't have time to test it now but will do it after Jul 20th. I am satisfied with rst-man2any.py, but as being normal picky me I wonder whether the command prefix 'rst-' is being too generic i.e. is invading that

Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] rst2man.py support and doc-build cleanups

2014-07-13 Thread W. Trevor King
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 09:05:41AM +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote: I am satisfied with rst-man2any.py, but as being normal picky me I wonder whether the command prefix 'rst-' is being too generic i.e. is invading that namespace. If no one else has the same feeling (or the feeling is just wrong (or

[PATCH v3 0/5] rst2man.py support and doc-build cleanups

2014-07-12 Thread W. Trevor King
Changes since v2 [1]: * In patches 1/5 and 5/5, use for loops to check for rst2man[.py] and rst2html[.py]. * In patches 1/5 and 5/5, store the command names, not the full paths (command -v ?) [2]. * In patch 3/5, I've added argparse handling to the newly-renamed rst-man2any.py. Tomi

[PATCH v3 0/5] rst2man.py support and doc-build cleanups

2014-07-12 Thread W. Trevor King
Changes since v2 [1]: * In patches 1/5 and 5/5, use for loops to check for rst2man[.py] and rst2html[.py]. * In patches 1/5 and 5/5, store the command names, not the full paths (command -v …) [2]. * In patch 3/5, I've added argparse handling to the newly-renamed rst-man2any.py. Tomi