On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:09:30 +0100, Xavier Maillard
wrote:
> Hey Pieter,
>
Hi!
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:19:00 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > Nice feature! I won't be using it myself, but I can imagine it being
> > *very* useful for those who still feel the need to "delete" email :).
>
> Add
Hey Pieter,
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:19:00 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Nice feature! I won't be using it myself, but I can imagine it being
> *very* useful for those who still feel the need to "delete" email :).
Adding a 'deleted' tag does not mean there will be a delete/purge
process ;) (curren
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:09:30 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote:
> Hey Pieter,
>
Hi!
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:19:00 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > Nice feature! I won't be using it myself, but I can imagine it being
> > *very* useful for those who still feel the need to "delete" email :).
>
> Addi
Hey Pieter,
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:19:00 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Nice feature! I won't be using it myself, but I can imagine it being
> *very* useful for those who still feel the need to "delete" email :).
Adding a 'deleted' tag does not mean there will be a delete/purge
process ;) (curren
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:01:27 +, Mark Walters
wrote:
>
> > > I am happy with them appearing as a non matching message, but currently
> > > they appear as a full open message. (The patch to achieve this is
> > > trivial: essentially transpose part of Austin's patch of
> > > notmuch-search.c in
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:36:47 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Pieter Praet on Jan 19 at 8:19 pm:
> > Nice feature! I won't be using it myself, but I can imagine it being
> > *very* useful for those who still feel the need to "delete" email :).
>
> Same here. I probably will use the spam t
> > I am happy with them appearing as a non matching message, but currently
> > they appear as a full open message. (The patch to achieve this is
> > trivial: essentially transpose part of Austin's patch of
> > notmuch-search.c into notmuch-show.c)
>
> This definitely sounds like the right thing
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:06:27 +, markwalters1009 at gmail.com wrote:
> > I would actually like make a different suggestion: extend
> > auto_exclude_tags to notmuch-show as well. I was quite surprised to see
> > my deleted (ie hidden rather than actually deleted) messages return when
> > viewi
Nice feature! I won't be using it myself, but I can imagine it being
*very* useful for those who still feel the need to "delete" email :).
Nitpicking:
- All other config-related functions and args include the section title
in their name [1], so for the sake of consistency, we might want to
> > So I'd like to suggest replacing all occurences of "auto_exclude_tags"
> > with "search_exclude_tags" (and simply "exclude_tags" in the args to
> > `_config_get_list' and `_config_set_list', of course).
>
> You are technically correct, the best kind of correct. I'd completely
> missed
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 19 at 8:23 pm:
>
> > On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:06:27 +, markwalters1009 at gmail.com wrote:
> > > I would actually like make a different suggestion: extend
> > > auto_exclude_tags to notmuch-show as well. I was quite surprised to see
> > > my deleted (ie hidden rather t
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:06:27 +, markwalters1009 at gmail.com wrote:
> I would actually like make a different suggestion: extend
> auto_exclude_tags to notmuch-show as well. I was quite surprised to see
> my deleted (ie hidden rather than actually deleted) messages return when
> viewing a thread
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:01:27 +, Mark Walters
wrote:
>
> > > I am happy with them appearing as a non matching message, but currently
> > > they appear as a full open message. (The patch to achieve this is
> > > trivial: essentially transpose part of Austin's patch of
> > > notmuch-search.c in
Quoth Pieter Praet on Jan 19 at 8:19 pm:
> Nice feature! I won't be using it myself, but I can imagine it being
> *very* useful for those who still feel the need to "delete" email :).
Same here. I probably will use the spam tag, though.
> Nitpicking:
>
> - All other config-related functions a
> > I am happy with them appearing as a non matching message, but currently
> > they appear as a full open message. (The patch to achieve this is
> > trivial: essentially transpose part of Austin's patch of
> > notmuch-search.c into notmuch-show.c)
>
> This definitely sounds like the right thing
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:36:47 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Pieter Praet on Jan 19 at 8:19 pm:
> > Nice feature! I won't be using it myself, but I can imagine it being
> > *very* useful for those who still feel the need to "delete" email :).
>
> Same here. I probably will use the spam t
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 19 at 8:23 pm:
>
> > On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:06:27 +, markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > I would actually like make a different suggestion: extend
> > > auto_exclude_tags to notmuch-show as well. I was quite surprised to see
> > > my deleted (ie hidden rather than
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:06:27 +, markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I would actually like make a different suggestion: extend
> > auto_exclude_tags to notmuch-show as well. I was quite surprised to see
> > my deleted (ie hidden rather than actually deleted) messages return when
> > viewing
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:06:27 +, markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
> I would actually like make a different suggestion: extend
> auto_exclude_tags to notmuch-show as well. I was quite surprised to see
> my deleted (ie hidden rather than actually deleted) messages return when
> viewing a thread.
> > So I'd like to suggest replacing all occurences of "auto_exclude_tags"
> > with "search_exclude_tags" (and simply "exclude_tags" in the args to
> > `_config_get_list' and `_config_set_list', of course).
>
> You are technically correct, the best kind of correct. I'd completely
> missed
Quoth Pieter Praet on Jan 19 at 8:19 pm:
> Nice feature! I won't be using it myself, but I can imagine it being
> *very* useful for those who still feel the need to "delete" email :).
Same here. I probably will use the spam tag, though.
> Nitpicking:
>
> - All other config-related functions a
Nice feature! I won't be using it myself, but I can imagine it being
*very* useful for those who still feel the need to "delete" email :).
Nitpicking:
- All other config-related functions and args include the section title
in their name [1], so for the sake of consistency, we might want to
This adds a "search" section to the config file and an
"auto_tag_exclusions" setting in that section. The search and count
commands pass tag tags from the configuration to the library.
---
notmuch-client.h |8
notmuch-config.c | 42 ++
notmuc
This adds a "search" section to the config file and an
"auto_tag_exclusions" setting in that section. The search and count
commands pass tag tags from the configuration to the library.
---
notmuch-client.h |8
notmuch-config.c | 42 ++
notmuc
24 matches
Mail list logo
