On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 09:25:41 -0400, Austin Clements wrote:
> Had I replaced it, though, there are two variations I would have
> tried.? Have you guys considered these and, if so, any thoughts?
>
> * Make SPC mark the *current* message read and move to the next one,
> rather than moving to the
Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Jul 07 at 1:40 pm:
> On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:49:35 +0200, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 09:25:41 -0400, Austin Clements
> > wrote:
> > > * Make SPC mark the *current* message read and move to the next one,
> > > rather than moving to the next and
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 16:58:08 -0400, Austin Clements wrote:
> What I'm suggesting is no more or less automatic than the current
> behavior. It's just a slight tweak to the order in which things
> happen: that SPC could remove the unread tag and then move to the next
> message, rather than the
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:49:35 +0200, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 09:25:41 -0400, Austin Clements
> wrote:
> > * Make SPC mark the *current* message read and move to the next one,
> > rather than moving to the next and marking it read.? This way, you're
> > acknowledging the
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:49:35 +0200, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 09:25:41 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
* Make SPC mark the *current* message read and move to the next one,
rather than moving to the next and marking it read. This way, you're
Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Jul 07 at 1:40 pm:
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:49:35 +0200, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 09:25:41 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
* Make SPC mark the *current* message read and move to the next one,
rather than moving
On Jul 5, 2011 4:23 PM, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:03:51 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 23:36:35 +0200, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
I like to use the space (and sometimes the backspace key) to
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:03:51 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 23:36:35 +0200, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
I like to use the space (and sometimes the backspace key) to read
threads back and forth, but
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 23:36:35 +0200, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> I like to use the space (and sometimes the backspace key) to read
> threads back and forth, but sometimes I might read stuff to quickly and
> archive a thread without wanting it. It is then complex to find it back
> (especially if the
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:42:01 +0100, Robin Green gree...@greenrd.org wrote:
It's really dangerous to use the 'a' key in notmuch-mode in an inbox
thread which has multiple unread replies! Yes, the other unread replies
will still be tagged unread, but the user might not immediately be aware
of
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 23:36:35 +0200, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
I like to use the space (and sometimes the backspace key) to read
threads back and forth, but sometimes I might read stuff to quickly and
archive a thread without wanting it. It is then complex to find it back
11 matches
Mail list logo
