On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> For the upcoming 0.2 release, here are some things that I would like to
> have in place:
>
> * Any further changes from the Sebastian's repository. Sebastian, I
> worked through one list I saw recently. Do you have another list to
>
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:52:21 -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> I would really like to see the patch in spaetz/issue15-handle-fcc-bcc
> applied soon. This is the lingering issue of bcc'ing the primary email
> address in notmuch replies, which I think really needs to be removed.
>
> Let me know if
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:47:00 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> First of all, thanks for the great work Carl. I have to admit I was
> getting nervous about the backlog of patches, but your recent committing
> binge (you did say your work patterns are bursty :-)) made me very happy.
You're quite
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:47:00 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
First of all, thanks for the great work Carl. I have to admit I was
getting nervous about the backlog of patches, but your recent committing
binge (you did say your work patterns are bursty :-)) made me very
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:52:21 -0400, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
I would really like to see the patch in spaetz/issue15-handle-fcc-bcc
applied soon. This is the lingering issue of bcc'ing the primary email
address in notmuch replies, which I think really needs to be
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
For the upcoming 0.2 release, here are some things that I would like to
have in place:
* Any further changes from the Sebastian's repository. Sebastian, I
worked through one list I saw recently. Do you have another
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 10:34:59AM -0400, Mike Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:23:14PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > > * Anything else that people want, (especially things that already
> > > exist and that you're already
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 10:34:59AM -0400, Mike Kelly wrote:
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:23:14PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
* Anything else that people want, (especially things that already
exist and that you're
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:02:19 +0200, Michal Sojka
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Carl n?tmuch ? Worth wrote:
> > > Are you all trying to show a problem here? All of the above comes
> > > through fine. Perhaps it's only with non-ASCII in the From
On 2010-04-10, Carl n?tmuch ? Worth wrote:
> Are you all trying to show a problem here? All of the above comes
> through fine. Perhaps it's only with non-ASCII in the From line being
> replied to? Let's test that here...
I think there are 2 issues being discussed here. One is the encoding in
the
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Carl n?tmuch ? Worth wrote:
> > On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:35:07 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" > SSpaeth.de> wrote:
> > > On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > > Perhaps Carl should get more N?rw?g?a? friends, :-).
> >
> > Or G?rm?n or ??
>
> Are you all trying to show a problem
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:52:04 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> frontends that are making use of json already, and once (if?) emacs uses
> the json output too, this will become an issue there too.
once, not if!
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:06:54 -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> Again, this subject line shows up fine for me in notmuch-show in emacs.
> I believe the non-ASCII characters in headers have to be escaped for
> mail handlers to properly handle them, and the reader should translate.
> I need to find a
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:02:19 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Carl n?tmuch ? Worth wrote:
> > Are you all trying to show a problem here? All of the above comes
> > through fine. Perhaps it's only with non-ASCII in the From line being
> > replied to?
>
> Yes and also in Subject
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:47:20 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:44:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> wrote:
> >
> > here's what's going wrong. Look at the To: line...
>
> Carl =?UTF-8?b?buKIhXRtdWNoIOSasw==?= Worth ,
The To: line shows up fine in notmuch-show for me (in emacs). It
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:52:04 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> On 2010-04-10, Carl n?tmuch ? Worth wrote:
> > Are you all trying to show a problem here? All of the above comes
> > through fine. Perhaps it's only with non-ASCII in the From line being
> > replied to? Let's test that here...
>
> I
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:05:00 -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:47:20 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:44:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > here's what's going wrong. Look at the To: line...
> >
> > Carl =?UTF-8?b?buKIhXRtdWNoIOSasw==?=
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 09:06:54AM -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> Again, this subject line shows up fine for me in notmuch-show in emacs.
> I believe the non-ASCII characters in headers have to be escaped for
> mail handlers to properly handle them, and the reader should translate.
> I need to
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Carl n∅tmuch 䚳 Worth wrote:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:35:07 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth
sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote:
On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote:
Perhaps Carl should get more Nørwég¡añ friends, :-).
Or Görmän or 中文
Are you all trying to show a problem here?
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:47:20 -0700, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org wrote:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:44:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org
wrote:
here's what's going wrong. Look at the To: line...
Carl =?UTF-8?b?buKIhXRtdWNoIOSasw==?= Worth cwo...@cworth.org,
The To: line
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:02:19 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Carl n∅tmuch 䚳 Worth wrote:
Are you all trying to show a problem here? All of the above comes
through fine. Perhaps it's only with non-ASCII in the From line being
replied to?
Yes and also
On 2010-04-10, Carl n∅tmuch 䚳 Worth wrote:
Are you all trying to show a problem here? All of the above comes
through fine. Perhaps it's only with non-ASCII in the From line being
replied to? Let's test that here...
I think there are 2 issues being discussed here. One is the encoding in
the
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:52:04 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
frontends that are making use of json already, and once (if?) emacs uses
the json output too, this will become an issue there too.
once, not if!
jamie.
pgpgzv5x4GFqI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 09:06:54AM -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote:
Again, this subject line shows up fine for me in notmuch-show in emacs.
I believe the non-ASCII characters in headers have to be escaped for
mail handlers to properly handle them, and the reader should translate.
I need to find a
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:05:00 -0400, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:47:20 -0700, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org
wrote:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:44:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org
wrote:
here's what's going wrong. Look at the
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:52:04 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
On 2010-04-10, Carl n∅tmuch 䚳 Worth wrote:
Are you all trying to show a problem here? All of the above comes
through fine. Perhaps it's only with non-ASCII in the From line being
replied to? Let's test that
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Jameson Rollins wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:02:19 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Carl n∅tmuch 䚳 Worth wrote:
Are you all trying to show a problem here? All of the above comes
through fine. Perhaps it's only with non-ASCII in the
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:44:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
wrote:
>
> here's what's going wrong. Look at the To: line...
Carl =?UTF-8?b?buKIhXRtdWNoIOSasw==?= Worth ,
that's not pretty... nor readable.
/D
--
Dirk Hohndel
Intel Open Source Technology Center
here's what's going wrong. Look at the To: line...
/D
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:06:09 -0700, Carl n?tmuch ? Worth
wrote:
> > On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:35:07 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" > SSpaeth.de> wrote:
> > > On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > > Perhaps Carl should get more N?rw?g?a? friends,
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:35:07 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" SSpaeth.de> wrote:
> > On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > Perhaps Carl should get more N?rw?g?a? friends, :-).
>
> Or G?rm?n or ??
Are you all trying to show a problem here? All of the above comes
through fine. Perhaps it's only with
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 00:03, Jameson Rollins
wrote:
> Presumably others must be annoyed about having to manually "read" and
> archive all their sent mail, unless there's some other way that people
> having been dealing with this that I'm not aware of.
I haven't switched over to notmuch properly
On 2010-04-08, micah anderson wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > For the upcoming 0.2 release, here are some things that I would like to
> > have in place:
> >
> > * Changes to indexing, (addition of body:, folder:, list:, etc.). This
> > is stuff that I'll
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:35:07 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > "Decode headers in reply"
> > (id:1267602656-24940-1-git-send-email-sojkam1 at fel.cvut.cz) is another
> > patch, which is quite essential to me. Am I the only one here, who needs
> > to reply
On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote:
> "Decode headers in reply"
> (id:1267602656-24940-1-git-send-email-sojkam1 at fel.cvut.cz) is another
> patch, which is quite essential to me. Am I the only one here, who needs
> to reply to messages with non-ASCII characters?
Nope, and it looks currently very
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
> * Anything else that people want, (especially things that already
> exist and that you're already using). Support for maildir flags on
> import would be great here. I'm still waiting to see a complete
> solution I think.
>
> So keep the
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 00:03, Jameson Rollins
> wrote:
> > Presumably others must be annoyed about having to manually "read" and
> > archive all their sent mail, unless there's some other way that people
> > having been dealing with this that I'm not
On 2010-04-08, micah anderson wrote:
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
For the upcoming 0.2 release, here are some things that I would like to
have in place:
* Changes to indexing, (addition of body:, folder:, list:, etc.). This
is stuff that
here's what's going wrong. Look at the To: line...
/D
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:06:09 -0700, Carl n∅tmuch 䚳 Worth cwo...@cworth.org
wrote:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:35:07 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth
sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote:
On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote:
Perhaps Carl should get more
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:44:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org wrote:
here's what's going wrong. Look at the To: line...
Carl =?UTF-8?b?buKIhXRtdWNoIOSasw==?= Worth cwo...@cworth.org,
that's not pretty... nor readable.
/D
--
Dirk Hohndel
Intel Open Source Technology Center
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 17:47, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> * Prevent data loss caused by SIGINT during notmuch new
> ?mail id:1269937403-8495-1-git-send-email-sojkam1 at fel.cvut.cz
> ?wentasah, commit dcb7a957027837f187f06d31fdcddb3740b2c20b
> ?(preventable data loss, has happened to him at least
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:28:20 -0700
Carl Worth wrote:
> 2. A "list:" prefix to match content from headers that identify
> mailing list. My perception is that there are likely a handful of
> different headers that have been used, and they should all be
> indexed so that "list:"
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:28:20 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> All of that sounds quite easy to do by simply saving the draft within
> the mailstore and giving it a "draft" tag.
The only way I can see to give drafts a "draft" tag is via 'folder:'
indexing. Do you have any ideas of other ways?
jamie.
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:03:15 -0400, Jameson Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > > For the upcoming 0.2 release, here are some things that I would like to
> > > have in place:
> > >
> > > *
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
> For the upcoming 0.2 release, here are some things that I would like to
> have in place:
>
> * Anything else that people want, (especially things that already
> exist and that you're already using). Support for maildir flags on
> import would be
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:58:47 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
wrote:
> > And as for drafts, they could be easily indexed and managed by the UI if
> > the folder: search term is available.
>
> Hmm - haven't even thought about drafts, yet. How would the UI deal with
> those?
My idea is the following:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 10:03:15AM -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > For the upcoming 0.2 release, here are some things that I would like to
> > have in place:
> >
> > * Changes to indexing, (addition of body:, folder:, list:, etc.). This
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:23:14PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > * Anything else that people want, (especially things that already
> > exist and that you're already using). Support for maildir flags on
> > import would be great
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> For the upcoming 0.2 release, here are some things that I would like to
> have in place:
>
> * Changes to indexing, (addition of body:, folder:, list:, etc.). This
> is stuff that I'll work on.
Also, fwiw, the folder: indexing is
Hey, Carl. I'm very encouraged by the recent patch-apply fest, and the
proposal for more regular releases. I have some new improvements I'll
try to get in at some point, but in the mean time...
> So keep the patches coming, and the pointers to patches that you want me
> to look at.
I would
First of all, thanks for the great work Carl. I have to admit I was
getting nervous about the backlog of patches, but your recent committing
binge (you did say your work patterns are bursty :-)) made me very happy.
That having said, I am glad to meet your expectation: "I expect people
to remind
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> * The big batch of emacs-client improvements from David E.'s
> repository. David, do you have particular things to recommend here?
It's necessary for me to merge with your latest batch of changes. That
won't happen until next week,
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:03:15 -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > For the upcoming 0.2 release, here are some things that I would like to
> > have in place:
> >
> > * Changes to indexing, (addition of body:, folder:, list:, etc.). This
> >
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:52:21 -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> > So keep the patches coming, and the pointers to patches that you want me
> > to look at.
>
> I would really like to see the patch in spaetz/issue15-handle-fcc-bcc
> applied soon. This is the lingering issue of bcc'ing the primary
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:13:20 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > * The big batch of emacs-client improvements from David E.'s
> > repository. David, do you have particular things to recommend here?
>
> It's necessary for me to merge
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> * Anything else that people want, (especially things that already
> exist and that you're already using). Support for maildir flags on
> import would be great here. I'm still waiting to see a complete
> solution I think.
First of all, thanks for the great work Carl. I have to admit I was
getting nervous about the backlog of patches, but your recent committing
binge (you did say your work patterns are bursty :-)) made me very happy.
That having said, I am glad to meet your expectation: I expect people
to remind
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
* The big batch of emacs-client improvements from David E.'s
repository. David, do you have particular things to recommend here?
It's necessary for me to merge with your latest batch of changes. That
won't happen
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 17:47, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote:
* Prevent data loss caused by SIGINT during notmuch new
mail id:1269937403-8495-1-git-send-email-sojk...@fel.cvut.cz
wentasah, commit dcb7a957027837f187f06d31fdcddb3740b2c20b
(preventable data loss, has happened to
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
For the upcoming 0.2 release, here are some things that I would like to
have in place:
* Anything else that people want, (especially things that already
exist and that you're already using). Support for maildir flags on
import would be great
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:13:20 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
* The big batch of emacs-client improvements from David E.'s
repository. David, do you have particular things to recommend here?
It's
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:52:21 -0400, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
So keep the patches coming, and the pointers to patches that you want me
to look at.
I would really like to see the patch in spaetz/issue15-handle-fcc-bcc
applied soon. This is the lingering issue of
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:58:47 -0700, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org wrote:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:03:15 -0400, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Also, fwiw, the folder: indexing is probably the new feature that I'm
most eagerly awaiting. I've got all these ideas for ways
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 00:03, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Presumably others must be annoyed about having to manually read and
archive all their sent mail, unless there's some other way that people
having been dealing with this that I'm not aware of.
I haven't switched
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
* Anything else that people want, (especially things that already
exist and that you're already using). Support for maildir flags on
import would be great here. I'm still waiting to see a complete
solution I think.
So keep the patches
We've obviously got a lot of interest in notmuch, and a huge pile of
features that need to be merged.
I think that means we're in a state where we can have extremely regular
releases, with continually improving feature sets. I'm thinking releases
once per week or so.
With each release, I expect
We've obviously got a lot of interest in notmuch, and a huge pile of
features that need to be merged.
I think that means we're in a state where we can have extremely regular
releases, with continually improving feature sets. I'm thinking releases
once per week or so.
With each release, I expect
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
* Anything else that people want, (especially things that already
exist and that you're already using). Support for maildir flags on
import would be great here. I'm still waiting to see a complete
solution I
67 matches
Mail list logo
