On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:59:09 +0200, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:30:09 +0200, Xavier Maillard
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:23:41 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > > On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:20:26 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre
> > > wrote:
> > > > Maybe it would also be interesting
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:59:09 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:30:09 +0200, Xavier Maillard xav...@maillard.im
wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:23:41 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:20:26 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:30:09 +0200, Xavier Maillard
wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:23:41 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:20:26 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre
> > wrote:
> > > Maybe it would also be interesting to add a warning/assertion to check
> > > that all email adresses
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:23:41 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:20:26 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> > Maybe it would also be interesting to add a warning/assertion to check
> > that all email adresses added to the database are correct email
> > addresses? I.e. check that the
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:20:26 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> Maybe it would also be interesting to add a warning/assertion to check
> that all email adresses added to the database are correct email
> addresses? I.e. check that the `addr' variable in _index_address_mailbox
> always has a @. This
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:20:26 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
Maybe it would also be interesting to add a warning/assertion to check
that all email adresses added to the database are correct email
addresses? I.e. check that the `addr' variable in _index_address_mailbox
always has a
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:51:59 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Re: Warning when GMime is parsing broken email addresses:
>
> On 11/18/2010 01:37 PM, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> > The problem is solved in version 2.4.18 (current is
> > 2.4.20). Unfortunately the last versio
On 11/20/2010 06:23 AM, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:51:59 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
>> Re: Warning when GMime is parsing broken email addresses:
>>
>> On 11/18/2010 01:37 PM, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
>>> The pr
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:51:59 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
Re: Warning when GMime is parsing broken email addresses:
On 11/18/2010 01:37 PM, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
The problem is solved in version 2.4.18 (current is
2.4.20). Unfortunately the last version
On 11/20/2010 06:23 AM, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:51:59 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
Re: Warning when GMime is parsing broken email addresses:
On 11/18/2010 01:37 PM, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
The problem is solved in version 2.4.18 (current
The problem is solved in version 2.4.18 (current is
2.4.20). Unfortunately the last version packaged for Debian is 2.4.14...
Matthieu
Re: Warning when GMime is parsing broken email addresses:
On 11/18/2010 01:37 PM, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> The problem is solved in version 2.4.18 (current is
> 2.4.20). Unfortunately the last version packaged for Debian is 2.4.14...
is the patch that fixes the problem it backportable to
The problem is solved in version 2.4.18 (current is
2.4.20). Unfortunately the last version packaged for Debian is 2.4.14...
Matthieu
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Hi,
I just realized that GMime is not robust to some broken email addresses
sent by broken email clients. I received a mail, with the to field being
.
The email client (Exchange) had forgotten to put a "" around
".", which is necessary because `.' is a special character, and
14 matches
Mail list logo
