Hi,
On 08-09-15 09:53, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 07-09-15 21:55, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
May I ask why you're doing 512x512 instead of 1024x1024? These are
already scaled up coordinates, so 1024x1024 should work no? Or is it
because of the seams on the edges? Do those not also appear with
512x512
Hi,
On 07-09-15 21:55, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
May I ask why you're doing 512x512 instead of 1024x1024? These are
already scaled up coordinates, so 1024x1024 should work no? Or is it
because of the seams on the edges? Do those not also appear with
512x512 or does it sample outside of the box?
This
May I ask why you're doing 512x512 instead of 1024x1024? These are
already scaled up coordinates, so 1024x1024 should work no? Or is it
because of the seams on the edges? Do those not also appear with
512x512 or does it sample outside of the box?
Separately, why not use this approach on nv40 as we
We do not have a generic blitter on nv3x cards, so we must use the
sifm object for color resolving.
This commit divides the sources and dest surfaces in to tiles which
match the constraints of the sifm object, so that color resolving
will work properly on nv3x cards.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede
