It is not clear to me what this patch is. From what I understand, it
is because some switches does not completely strip VLAN tags. Is that
what this is? Can't really comment on anything I do not understand,
beyond I am unclear on what this is.
As for patches, I am particularly touchy on
KK,
Here is what I have seen with my particular switch configuration.
For the Asterix demo, a tunnel machine was set up with one
interface connected to the Princeton campus network and another
interface connected to an HP 5406zl OpenFlow switch. The OpenFlow
switch port was manually
Hi,
I must say this patch sits very much on the gray zone. I personally
think we can take it in as long as it does not affect other switch
implementation. Of course, I am assuming discovery will not use VLAN
tag for other purposes here. I am happy to push this as long as I can
have someone
Hi KK/Chris
This patch by itself won't work because it doesn't keep track of VLAN
IDs to reuse in the packet_out for the LLDP. Let me rewrite one for
that and send you after testing it in our HP network in Flashlab.
Srini.
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 1:48 PM, kk yap yap...@stanford.edu wrote:
Hi,
