Hi
Sorry to bother others.
In order to establish packet forwarding between switches, the rule
should be sent to switch before the first packet is sent back. The
race condition is the packet is sent back and even forwarded by the
first switch, but it doesnt find a rule in the second switch although
Hi Guanyao,
From what I know this is not resolved. Do you recall where you heard
that this is resolved in NOX 0.5?
I put in a component in NOX 0.6 (not available publicly) to install
the route/tree in reverse order, i.e., destination first. This is not
foolproof either, since there is no
I heard this from my supervisor. I also think this is not resolved,
because it seems hard to resolve this.
I think to guarantee flow_mod be set up for every switch, it is better
to install in the initial order, that means, the first switch
installed first, because the packet will hit in this
Hi Guanyao,
I do not understand
I think to guarantee flow_mod be set up for every switch, it is better
to install in the initial order, that means, the first switch
In that case, the second packet-in will still occur. Wouldn't it?
Imagine route A-B-C, and we send the flow_mod to A first. Then
Right. I understand. We want to flow_cmd B and C before sending back
first packet.
Thanks.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:19 PM, kk yap yap...@stanford.edu wrote:
Hi Guanyao,
I do not understand
I think to guarantee flow_mod be set up for every switch, it is better
to install in the initial
