On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> As per prior discussions here it seems that there's
> a general consensus that retirement is the most
> reasonable path forward.
&
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> As per prior discussions here it seems that there's
> a general consensus that retirement is the most
> reasonable path forward.
&
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> As per prior discussions here it seems that there's
> a general consensus that retirement is the most
> reasonable path forward.
&
This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling.
As per prior discussions here it seems that there's
a general consensus that retirement is the most
reasonable path forward.
Vote will run for at least 72 hours (to 1/19/15, noon PST).
[ ] +1 Recommend retiring NPanday
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:04 PM, m...@lcorneliussen.de
wrote:
> http://incubator.apache.org/npanday/docs/1.5.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/developers/releasing.html
>
> I'm sure Brett is happy to assist (I have never done a release either...)
Sure. The question is: who does have cycles to go through all
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:50 AM, David Akehurst wrote:
> I will try
What's the timeline on this?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:42 PM, David Akehurst wrote:
> I would be willing to work on the release, but am not sure how to do it.
At this point, what would be required from you is producing a tarball
containing what you would want to publish as a release. Do you think
you can accomplish this in t
be happy to
>> help with it from the IPMC standpoint. And even if later we'll decide that no
>> more releases are needed - as it might have matured enough or for another
>> reason - it will at least have a logical end-point of its life-cycle.
>>
>> So, shall we re
ow 1.5 is now.
>>>
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/npanday/docs/1.5.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/developers/releasing.html
>>>
>>> So if someone volunteers - just go ahead.
>>> _
>>> Lars
>>>
>>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>&
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 2:08 AM, David Akehurst wrote:
> I would like it to stay
> I have done some development for it
Please note that retirement doesn't make source code
go away -- it will still be available for you to use and hack on.
Retirement is ASF's way of telling outside world that even
Hi NPandy folks!
Is there any real chance of this podling building momentum
and becoming a viable Apache project?
It seems that your active mentors (e.g. Konstantin Boudnik)
have indicated to the IPMC that they believe this is unlikely
to happen and have recommended retirement of the podling.
U
k wrote:
> Hey Roman.
>
> I can find a few cycles to help with that, if no one else with more experience
> wants to step in.
>
> Regards,
> Cos
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 06:04PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> given the current situation with NP
ago so I am not quite up to date with what's
> happening on the project.
>
> I took a quick look now at the Jira and commit notifications, and the last
> commit was on April 4. There were also a number of tickets reported in the
> recent weeks, but there doesn't seem to be
Hi!
given the current situation with NPanday's mentors,
I'd like to request additional help from IPMC. If you
could consider spending your cycles helping
NPanday community figure out the roadmap ahead,
please reply to this thread.
My goal is to find at least one active replacement
mentor by the e
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Deng Ching-Mallete wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> My apologies, I didn't see your email immediately. Unfortunately, I am no
> longer an active mentor for NPanday. I've already stepped down as mentor
> for the project over a year ago so I am not quite up to date with what's
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:18 AM, David Akehurst wrote:
> I hope the project has not gone dormant.
> I still actively use it, and hoping for its continued development and
> eventual (soon) promotion from incubating.
At the very minimum the project would require some active
mentors. Hang in there -
Hi!
first of all, I'd like to apologize for the mix up on the
IPMC part where we didn't notify you guys that your
report is due for this board meeting.
That said, given that the project hasn't submitted reports
in a few months, I'm wondering whether there's anybody
who can clarify the current sta
17 matches
Mail list logo
