If you guys think that the state of the code based is such that you can do a release I can most likely help get you 3 IPMC members to vote on it.
Then we can do one final release and retire the poddling. Thanks, Roman. On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:21 AM, David Akehurst <d...@akehurst.net> wrote: > How. I'll do it if no one else does! > > Might even clone the code and release it myself anyways. > > On Monday, 15 December 2014, David Akehurst <d...@akehurst.net> wrote: > >> Yes please release 1.5 >> >> >> >> On Monday, 15 December 2014, Lars Corneliussen // Zen <m...@lcorneliussen.de >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','m...@lcorneliussen.de');>> wrote: >> >>> Hi Roman, >>> >>> even though it "hurts" I think retiring the project is the right thing to >>> do. >>> Not because of the quality of NPanday, but just because the (developer!) >>> community is effectively gone. >>> >>> While I'm still using NPanday every day (1.5 snapshot), it is all on the >>> same project and there is no need for further development currently. >>> >>> And just the fact that we haven't been able to release 1.5 for ages shows >>> the lack of a functioning community. >>> >>> I might invest in releasing 1.5 - but I might also keep saying this the >>> years to come. >>> >>> Although for releasing 1.5 we wouldn't need more than somebody just doing >>> the release with how 1.5 is now. >>> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/npanday/docs/1.5.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/developers/releasing.html >>> >>> So if someone volunteers - just go ahead. >>> _ >>> Lars >>> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>> Von: shaposh...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von >>> Roman Shaposhnik >>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 14. Dezember 2014 19:29 >>> An: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> Cc: npanday-us...@incubator.apache.org >>> Betreff: Re: Determining next steps for the NPanday >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 2:08 AM, David Akehurst <d...@akehurst.net> >>> wrote: >>> > I would like it to stay >>> > I have done some development for it >>> >>> Please note that retirement doesn't make source code go away -- it will >>> still be available for you to use and hack on. >>> >>> Retirement is ASF's way of telling outside world that even though source >>> is still there and available, the community is gone. Now, as I said, the >>> measure of the community "being there" could be interpreted as *at the very >>> least* having 3 active participants since all decisions would require 3 >>> votes minimum. >>> >>> Not sure if NPanday has that, but would love to be contradicted. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Roman. >>> >>> P.S. Finally, should 3 active participants show up after the retirement, >>> reviving the project takes very little time. >>> Hence its not like a permanent state of things. >>> >>>
