allah
> Cc: ns users
> Subject: Re: [ns] CBR over TCP ?
>
>
> TCP has its own estimation of stable link and suitable time to send the
> packet, so usually it is avoided. at least it is the case with me.
>
> S.
>
>
> On 2/27/06, alaeddine abdallah <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Sounds good. Thank you!
Regards,
Kai
_
From: alaeddine abdallah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 7:00 AM
To: Mohammad Zubair Ahmad; kaibai; Sasan
Cc: ns users
Subject: Re: [ns] CBR over TCP ?
Thank you all for your remarks,
I said in the first
Thank you all for your remarks,
I said in the first mail that simulation with CBR traffic and TCP was
working but the problem was that the pacet size of CBR was ignored and the
rate at the destination was not constant.
In fact, the CBR is in the application layer and the TCP is in the transport
, February 27, 2006 10:03 AM
To: alaeddine abdallah
Cc: ns users
Subject: Re: [ns] CBR over TCP ?
TCP has its own estimation of stable link and suitable time to send the
packet, so usually it is avoided. at least it is the case with me.
S.
On 2/27/06, alaeddine abdallah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TCP has its own estimation of stable link and suitable time to send the
packet, so usually it is avoided. at least it is the case with me.
S.
On 2/27/06, alaeddine abdallah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In my knowledge in NS, we use UDP to simulate CBR traffic since it is a
> Consta
Hi,
In my knowledge in NS, we use UDP to simulate CBR traffic since it is a
Constant Bit Rate. But if we simulate CBR with TCP as a transport agent, the
simulation works but only the packet size declared int the TCP layer is
considered and not that of the CBR traffic.
So my question is:is
