|dcB dcB|dGB c2e|dcB dcB|Ggf d2
e|dcB dcB|dGB c2e|d/c/B/A/B/G/ B>cd|dgf d2||
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of Paul
Gretton [i...@gretton-willems.com]
Sent: 02 November 2010 10:25
To: 'Matt Seattle'
Cc: 'NSP group'
Subject: [NS
ufay, Ockeghem and Josquin.
Cheers,
Paul Gretton
-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf
Of Matt Seattle
Sent: 02 November 2010 10:58
To: Gibbons, John
Cc: Richard York; NSP group
Subject: [NSP] Re: Tune hunt: OT but I hope interestin
I see why you prefer the 3-strain Reavely version as more
consistent,
but the Crawhall strain 4 is worth having - perhaps better if
tweaked to fit the others from Reavely.
I should have another look in that case, thanks.
I have been thinking about this, and Lord Randal
abilities are
common to both.
John
From: Matt Seattle [theborderpi...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 01 November 2010 12:35
To: Gibbons, John
Cc: Richard York; NSP group
Subject: Re: [NSP] Re: Tune hunt: OT but I hope interesting!
Same tune, different version. The
Same tune, different version. The one I give is from Reavely, as the
title but not the tune is given by Bewick, and Reavely is the one I
found for the 1998 edition; it's also structurally more consistent than
Crawhall's. It's not in the 1986 edition.
The 2010 edition is an update of
On 1 Nov 2010, Francis Wood wrote:
>
> On 1 Nov 2010, at 12:19, Gibbons, John wrote:
> > I should get the new edition too...
>
> You should. And so should everyone else. Absolutely excellent!
Well, if we're into blatant advertising:
Price 4 UKP to NPS members, 7 UKP to others.
Carriage is 1.5
On 1 Nov 2010, at 12:19, Gibbons, John wrote:
> I should get the new edition too...
You should. And so should everyone else. Absolutely excellent!
Francis
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
: [NSP] Re: Tune hunt: OT but I hope interesting!
I've no idea whether it's got anything to do with Lord Randal.
I was made aware, from my reading, of the idea that 'Billy Boy' and
'Lord Randal' are sort-of counterparts to each other, humorous and
tragic
I've no idea whether it's got anything to do with Lord Randal.
I was made aware, from my reading, of the idea that 'Billy Boy' and
'Lord Randal' are sort-of counterparts to each other, humorous and
tragic, and both have relatively old antecedents.
The Note in Bewick merely hints at
.. that's a cunning way of reminding me that while I still have your
original yellow Bewick book, I ought to buy the new one too, Matt :-)
I will order one anyway, but do you mean by this you think it's not Lord
Randall either? (Sorry, being thick here - it'll probably be clearer
once I own t
"Where have you been all the night?" she describes as a "Scotch
Tune".
It's tempting to think she's mis-remembered the line in "Billy
Boy",
See the Note in the recently published NPS edition of Bewicks Pipe
Tunes, which has a tune of the title which is *not* Billy Boy
It's difficult to know.
I don't want to hijack too much time from the pipes here, and am asking
the hurdy gurdy group to share any views on this.
There are arguments for and against both dulcimer & gurdy as we know
it, in the text.
Thanks for the help, though!
Best wishes,
R
On 31 Oct 2010, at 16:13, Richard York wrote:
> Henry Mayhew in the 1850's interviewed "Old Sarah" a blind Londonstreet
> hurdy gurdy player who was taught in the very early years of the 1800's
> to play what she called the "cymbal".
"Hurdy gurdy" has been used variously in the past to descr
John,
I am both in your debt, and hugely impressed at the speed and
thoroughness of your series of replies... you obviously got the
proverbial bit between the teeth!
Fantastic - I like ending up with Marlborough! And what's more it's a
tune I can play on the gurdy when talking ab
14 matches
Mail list logo
