Be interesting to see if Morgan backs off getting involved like he did with
Mick for so long. I suspect he has the taste for it now.
On 14 February 2012 13:30, Marcus Chantry wrote:
> Interesting poll on The Telegraph website asking whether Wolves were right
> to sack McCarthy.
>
> 39.96% (1,
I wonder how many Wolves fans read the Torygraph now that Enoch has passed on?
-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 1:31 PM
To: NSWolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Telegraph
Interesting
Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 1:42 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Telegraph
I wonder how many Wolves fans read the Torygraph now that Enoch has passed on?
-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com]
LEESE Matthew
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 1:45 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Telegraph
Did you email the club yesterday Jim? Seems too much of a co-incidence that the
moment you threw your support behind the 'Mick out' campaign Morgan finally
t
Very interesting. A 60 / 40 split in favour of MM. I would have expected this
to be the other way round. Hope they do the same poll at the end of the season.
Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Chantry
Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012
Poor old Mick. A one million pound pay off and walks straight into a job
at a bigger club.
On 14 February 2012 13:30, Marcus Chantry wrote:
> Interesting poll on The Telegraph website asking whether Wolves were right
> to sack McCarthy.
>
> 39.96% (1,198 votes) said yes
> 60.04% (1,800 votes)
Most of the No vote was from WBA, Notlob, Wigan and Blackburn fans.
-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of paul
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 1:51 PM
To: Nsw Wolves
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Telegraph
Very interesting. A 60
Mick and Master Bates.
For some reason they sound perfectly suited.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 1:57 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Telegraph
Poor old Mick. A one
ups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
> Behalf
> Of paul
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 1:51 PM
> To: Nsw Wolves
> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Telegraph
>
> Very interesting. A 60 / 40 split in favour of MM. I would have expected
> this to be the other way round. Hope th
[NSWolves] Telegraph
Mick and Master Bates.
For some reason they sound perfectly suited.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 1:57 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Telegraph
mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 2:45 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Telegraph
Anyone spoken to supporters of other teams? Everyone I've spoken to thinks
it was a bad move.
On 14 February 2012 14:01, Rog & Reet
d I don’t mean McLeish!)
>
> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Steven Millward
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 2:45 PM
> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Telegraph
>
> Anyone spoken to supporters of o
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 2:45 PM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Telegraph
>
> ** **
>
> Anyone spoken to supporters of other teams? Everyone I've spoken to
: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:33:44
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Telegraph
Agreed. The timing is appalling. It's not as if this run of crapness is
something new as we've. Even like for most of this season. He should have got
someone in w
ge of the season?
>>
>> The only way it’s a good move is if Morgan et al already have Alex lined up
>> as a replacement (and I don’t mean McLeish!)
>>
>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
>> Of Steven Millward
>> Se
: *nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:33:44 +1100
> *To: *nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *ReplyTo: *nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject: *Re: [NSWolves] Telegraph
>
> Agreed. The timing is appalling. It's not as if this run of crapness is
> something
l wager another carton of beer that whoever the new chap is will keep
>> us up.
>> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
>> From: Marcus Chantry
>> Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:33:44 +1100
>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> R
ong to
>> make a decision.
>> I will wager another carton of beer that whoever the new chap is will
>> keep us up.
>> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
>> --
>> *From: *Marcus Chantry
>> *Sender: *nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb
p
>>> us up.
>>> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
>>> From: Marcus Chantry
>>> Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com
>>> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:33:44 +1100
>>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
>>> ReplyTo: nswolves@googlegroups.com
>>> Su
UNCLASSIFIED
The question should have been should Wolves have sacked McCarthy six
months ago...
The timing couldn't be any worse.
-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 12:31
To:
t: Re: [NSWolves] Telegraph
Be interesting to see if Morgan backs off getting involved like he did
with Mick for so long. I suspect he has the taste for it now.
On 14 February 2012 13:30, Marcus Chantry wrote:
Interesting poll on The Telegraph website asking whether Wolves
were rig
21 matches
Mail list logo
