Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:47:26 -0700, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> (A bug: \defineactivecharacter ḻ {\~l} does not work if \showboxes is
>>> invoked; weird)
>> use \normalhbox cum suis when you want to use showboxes (which overloads
>> the primitive box ope
Hans has updated mk.pdf
> (btw, this phenomena is mentioned in mk.pdf, of which there is an
> updated version)
>
> Hans
Among others things, XML section, even if under construction .
--
luigi
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/User:Luigi.scarso/Merry_Christmas_2007
it's new .
it's powerful .
it's
Dne sreda 26. decembra 2007 je Taco Hoekwater napisal(a):
ad 1. & 2.:
Thanks, works like a charm :]
>Solution: none. it is not possible to combine 'short' citation
>and mainmatter/backmatter/appendices. (this problem is nasty, but
>quite hard to fix).
Damn. What I need to do is:
* fo
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:47:26 -0700, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (A bug: \defineactivecharacter ḻ {\~l} does not work if \showboxes is
>> invoked; weird)
>
> use \normalhbox cum suis when you want to use showboxes (which overloads
> the primitive box operations)
Hmm, it's more serious
Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 12:32:50 -0700, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
>>
>>> Two things:
>>>
>>> 1. The [EMAIL PROTECTED] macro (from TeXBook, p.~356) does not work in
>>> luatex (see
>>> test file, pdftex works);
>>>
>>> 2. In any ca
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 12:32:50 -0700, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
Two things:
1. The [EMAIL PROTECTED] macro (from TeXBook, p.~356) does not work in luatex
(see
test file, pdftex works);
2. In any case: Is there a better way to do this (see test file)?
as
Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
> Two things:
>
> 1. The [EMAIL PROTECTED] macro (from TeXBook, p.~356) does not work in luatex
> (see
> test file, pdftex works);
>
> 2. In any case: Is there a better way to do this (see test file)?
as taco mentioned ... most open type fonts have no italic correcti
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> (One question though: doesn't Ubuntu provide pretty recent files
> already, or is that only in unstable versions?)
Ubuntu 7.10 ships with context 2007.04.17. For me that is not recent
enough.
Aditya
___
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Ciro Soto wrote:
> Hello all,
> I used Context to write an entire novel in 2005 (under Fedora linux).
> Since then I didn't
> do any work in Context until now. I am now coming back
> to write a second book (under Ubuntu this time), and found myself
> totally confused with all
Peter Rolf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can anyone with an actual *luatex* test, if this fails (live ConTeXt is
> broken). My binaries are from the minimals at contextgarden (pragma
> tree), ConTeXt is the latest beta.
if you consider how color is implemented, this is actually not a bug
what do you expect i
Hello all,
I used Context to write an entire novel in 2005 (under Fedora linux).
Since then I didn't
do any work in Context until now. I am now coming back
to write a second book (under Ubuntu this time), and found myself
totally confused with all
this new business of luatex, mkii, mkiv, installati
Hi Yannis,
I had recently a new MacBook Pro (my good old PowerBook was stolen…)
and so I installed MacOS X 10.5 on my Intel based MacBook.
I confirm that I cannot run LuaTeX (actually I never could run
anything other than very simple ConTeXt mkii files with luatex…).
Following up the discussi
Matija Šuklje wrote:
Hullo,
I'm just making my first real document in ConTeXt and although I'm thinking
more and more how this was a great idea. I also decided to simultaneously
write an external document/module containing all definitions to fit the
But as a newbie, of course, I stumbled up
On Dec 26, 2007 1:56 AM, Joel C. Salomon wrote:
> I'm trying to put everything together so potential problems are easily
> identifiable, and so that a recipe or shell script can perhaps be put
> on the wiki.
>
> On Dec 23, 2007 5:08 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> > Also, if you already have a working
On Dec 25, 2007 11:13 AM, Yannis Haralambous
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Le 24 déc. 07 à 21h50, Taco Hoekwater a écrit :
>
>
> Something changed from 10.4 to 10.5
> I spent 30 minutes installing 10.5 and after ten minutes decided to return
> to 10.4 (which took me a few hours).
> Nothing worked
Le 24 déc. 07 à 21h50, Taco Hoekwater a écrit :
Something changed from 10.4 to 10.5
I spent 30 minutes installing 10.5 and after ten minutes decided to
return to 10.4 (which took me a few hours).
Nothing worked anymore, neither X, nor Classic. And to install Time
Machine I needed twice the
16 matches
Mail list logo
