try \setupinteraction[state=start]
Greetings Lutz
2008/5/29 Bernhard Boser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I wrote a simple context file for pdf form filling. Translates fine, but the
> resulting pdf simply shows text but no fillable forms. What's needed to
> actually get forms?
>
>
>
> Here's the tex cod
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 7:08 AM, Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 May 2008, Maurício wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just because I'm curious: how could a typesetting system like TeX
>> be if it was created today?
luatex
http://www.luatex.org
> There is ant http://ant.berlios.de/
> R
> There is ant http://ant.berlios.de/, but it is supposed to be saner form of
> TeX (in terms of source code, and easy of configuration) which was developed
> from scratch. The user interface is quite similar to TeX. I do not know much
> about the internal differences between Ant and TeX.
>
ANT hav
Maurício wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just because I'm curious: how could a typesetting system like TeX
> be if it was created today? I've tried google and wikipedia, and
> all I found different from TeX is a system called 'Lout', but it
> seems dead.
>
> Does anyone knows about novel or interesting ideas
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
>> Does anyone knows about novel or interesting ideas that could be
>> used if we would write a new typesetting system from scratch?
>
> River detection, which is done by ant, but not by TeX.
If there was a clear algorithm I could implement that in luatex.
But I have n
Hi!
At the moment I use Emacs Muse for writing my study notes which I then
have to submit as *.doc file (muse --> html -> OO --> doc).
I like it 'cause it enables me to combine all the notes and convert into
ConTeXt later.
However, the only disadvantage of it is that Muse markup is tied to
Emacs
Hi.
> Practically speaking, I expect it would be a lot like lyx with
> tex built in. Who would design a document language without
> front-end these days?
>
Maybe using LuaTeX + wxLua + Poppler is a better approach?
Yue Wang
Am 30.05.2008 um 09:12 schrieb Yue Wang:
> advanced software, like InDesign
well ... ...
Steffen
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@nt
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Gour wrote:
> Hi!
>
> At the moment I use Emacs Muse for writing my study notes which I then
> have to submit as *.doc file (muse --> html -> OO --> doc).
>
> I like it 'cause it enables me to combine all the notes and convert into
> ConTeXt later.
>
> However, the only disadv
2008/5/30 Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>> River detection, which is done by ant, but not by TeX.
>
> If there was a clear algorithm I could implement that in luatex.
> But I have not seen any whitepaper on the subject and I cannot
> read OCaml source well enough to un
On 5/30/08, Steffen Wolfrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am 30.05.2008 um 09:12 schrieb Yue Wang:
>
> > advanced software, like InDesign
>
>
> well ... ...
There is no denying that many advanced features in InDesign are
missing in TeX(like) related software. What's more, the
internationalizatio
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 6:18 AM, Maurício <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just because I'm curious: how could a typesetting system like TeX
> be if it was created today? I've tried google and wikipedia, and
> all I found different from TeX is a system called 'Lout', but it
> seems dead.
>
I
Hi Yue,
On Fri, 30 May 2008 06:24:56 -0600, Yue Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > advanced software, like InDesign
>>
>>
>> well ... ...
>
> There is no denying that many advanced features in InDesign are
> missing in TeX(like) related software. What's more, the
> internationalization of InDe
Am 30.05.2008 um 14:24 schrieb Yue Wang:
> On 5/30/08, Steffen Wolfrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Am 30.05.2008 um 09:12 schrieb Yue Wang:
>>
>>> advanced software, like InDesign
>>
>>
>> well ... ...
>
> There is no denying that many advanced features in InDesign are
> missing in TeX(like
On Friday 30 May 2008 16:15:08 Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
> Am 30.05.2008 um 14:24 schrieb Yue Wang:
> > On 5/30/08, Steffen Wolfrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Am 30.05.2008 um 09:12 schrieb Yue Wang:
> >>> advanced software, like InDesign
> >>
> >> well ... ...
> >
> > There is no denying that m
> "Aditya" == Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello Mahajan ;)
Aditya> Have a look at pandoc which converts markdown to ConTeXt and
Aditya> also to many other formats including html. There was also some
Aditya> discussion for conversion to OO, but I do not know the current
Aditya>
Hi,
hope the answer to my question is not too obvious: How do I split not
only TABLE but cells?
Please, have a look at this minimal:
\starttext
\bTABLE[split=yes,option=stretch]
\bTR
\bTD
\input tufte \input knuth Hello world ...
\eTD
\bTD
\input tufte
\eTD
\bTD
\input knuth
\eTD
\eTR
\bTR
\bT
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> hope the answer to my question is not too obvious: How do I split not
> only TABLE but cells?
>
> Please, have a look at this minimal:
>
> \starttext
> \bTABLE[split=yes,option=stretch]
> \bTR
> \bTD
> \input tufte \input knuth Hello world ...
> \eTD
> \bTD
> \
Am 2008-05-30 um 14:31 schrieb Idris Samawi Hamid:
>> There is no denying that many advanced features in InDesign are
>> missing in TeX(like) related software. What's more, the
>> internationalization of InDesign is better.
>
> Can you give a precise list of the features contained in InDesign
> t
> There are still some areas where you need a programmable system, even
> trivia like chapter dependant running titles (in ConTeXt: headertexts).
Isn't indesign programmable too ?
I know people who use it in an automatic workflow for db publishing
--
luigi
_
20 matches
Mail list logo