Re: [NTG-context] Table "modules"

2018-10-29 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Joseph Wright wrote: Hans: Thanks for the quick reply. I'll suggest to the LaTeX team that we treat table modules as ConTeXt-specific/reserved, and will think of a different name. How about `package`? Aditya ___

Re: [NTG-context] \framed regression

2018-10-29 Thread Herbert Voss
Am 29.10.18 um 16:13 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm: But it doesn’t help with my labels. you have a \setupinterlinespace[2ex] so \offinterlinespace has no real meaning here. Try it without and \setupinterlinespace[0.1pt] And why did it work without \offinterlineskip before? No idea ... He

Re: [NTG-context] \framed regression

2018-10-29 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 2018-10-28 um 20:49 schrieb Herbert Voss : > Am 28.10.18 um 20:37 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm: >> If I just typeset frames, they get 1pt of space inbetween: >> \starttext > > \offinterlineskip > >> \dorecurse{20}{% >> %\vskip-1pt% to avoid space >> \framed[width=10cm,height=1cm]{\ConTeXt}

Re: [NTG-context] Table "modules"

2018-10-29 Thread Joseph Wright
On 28/10/2018 16:06, Joseph Wright wrote: Hello all, Looking at management of global Lua tables (for the obvious cases ...), I notice that all of the core Mk IV files use the construct     if not modules then modules = { } end     modules[" From a ConTeXt point-of-view, is it acceptable for

Re: [NTG-context] columnset regression

2018-10-29 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 2018-10-28 um 22:07 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster : > Henning Hraban Ramm schrieb am 28.10.18 um 20:49: >> If a columnset starts below something else (text, image, frame), the second >> and further columns start at the top of the type area instead of below the >> upper object. >> >> \definecolu