Hi list! I want to know how to properly use footnotes in math mode. The
following:
\starttext
\startformula
\int_{a}^{b} f(x) d x=\lim _{h=0}\left[\int_{a}^{c-h} f(x) d
x+\int_{c+h}^{b} f(x) d x\right] \startfootnote Footnote \stopfootnote
\stopformula
\stoptext
doesn't complain but it doesn't sh
Jairo A. del Rio schrieb am 28.06.2020 um 12:54:
Hi list! I want to know how to properly use footnotes in math mode. The
following:
\starttext
\startformula
\int_{a}^{b} f(x) d x=\lim _{h=0}\left[\int_{a}^{c-h} f(x) d
x+\int_{c+h}^{b} f(x) d x\right] \startfootnote Footnote \stopfootnote
\sto
Hello,
I tried ConTeXt a few years ago, then gave up on it because of its
wordiness and verbosity. The 2006 article on creating AMSTeX output in
ConTeXt at https://www.ntg.nl/maps/34/06.pdf shows exactly what I mean: the
LaTeX commands are small and neat; the ConTeXt commands are not.
However, I
It's "subscribe nodigest", right? Sorry for the inconveniences
Jairo :)
El dom., 28 de jun. de 2020 a la(s) 06:11, Wolfgang Schuster (
wolfgang.schuster.li...@gmail.com) escribió:
> Jairo A. del Rio schrieb am 28.06.2020 um 12:54:
> > Hi list! I want to know how to properly use footnotes in math
> Of course, I'm glad that TexLab project does provide LSP support and bringing
> it to the Kakoune editor as well, but I'm sure that many of you know
> that bringing ConTeXt support to TexLab would benefit users of **many**
> other editors since these today many most popular editors (Atom, Emacs,
Jairo A. del Rio schrieb am 28.06.2020 um 13:43:
It's "subscribe nodigest", right? Sorry for the inconveniences
Yes but the config page [1] has explanations for all options to know
what each does.
[1] https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman/options/ntg-context
Wolfgang
_
Hi list! I've tried adapting the following code for continued fractions:
%https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/73195/how-to-typeset-a-continued-fraction-in-the-following-format
\documentclass{article}\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}\newcommand*{\cofrac}[2]{%
{%
\rlap{$\dfrac{1}{\phan
On Sun, 28 Jun 2020, Alasdair McAndrew wrote:
I tried ConTeXt a few years ago, then gave up on it because of its
wordiness and verbosity. The 2006 article on creating AMSTeX output in
ConTeXt at https://www.ntg.nl/maps/34/06.pdf shows exactly what I mean: the
LaTeX commands are small and neat;
I've read the following is not possible in TeX
\def#1\macro{blabla#1}
where arguments come before. The only partial exceptions are commands like
\atop or \over, which are in fact primitives. Is there a way to do this in
ConTeXt?
Could it be a feature request for LuaMetaTeX? I've seen Hans experi
Do you think it would be easy to change the current behavior ? do you want me
to try to propose a workaround ? I am not so familiar with mkiv files, but I
can try.
> Le 27 juin 2020 à 19:16, Wolfgang Schuster
> a écrit :
>
> Garulfo schrieb am 27.06.2020 um 19:00:
>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>
>> Did
Thank you very much - I think the problem was with a LaTeX "align"
environment which pandoc translated into a setting which ConTeXt didn't
recognize. These equations were monsters, so I'll try with simpler
equations to give you an idea. But in fact what you say makes perfect
sense, and I'll go b
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020, Alasdair McAndrew wrote:
(For matrices and arrays I still prefer the neat LaTeX implementation, but
maybe that's simply my general unfamiliarity with ConTeXt.) Thanks again!
Matrices can also be entered using MATLAB syntax (you need to specify a
`simplecommand` for mathm
12 matches
Mail list logo