On Dec 13, 2004, at 1:02 PM, Adam Lindsay wrote:
What I propose is clearly a debatable XML-design issue, but it seemed
strange that fx:definelayout and fx:p were put into the same namespace.
Why do the formatting definitions share the same (theoretical) schema
as
markup? Your documents keep these
On Dec 15, 2004, at 12:16 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
that was from the time that i played with schema's, nowadays i prefer
relax ng
Indeed!
It may be worth noting that the next generation versions of both
DocBook and TEI:
- are developed in RELAX NG
- are namespaced
- are designed for customizabil
Taco Hoekwater elvenkind.com> writes:
[.. snip ...]
> The next major release of the module (but don't expect a release
> anywhere this year) will indeed support MODS through citeproc:
>
> http://xbiblio.sourceforge.net/citeproc/
As the author of citeproc (hi Taco!), let me just update pe
Hi Hans,
Hans Hagen wxs.nl> writes:
> I wonder, is there any interest in the following:
>
> - support for http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/ as basic bibl format
I think Ulf's conclusions are right. MODS is expressive, which is why I was
originally attracted to it, but it's also more complex t
Ulf Martin web.de> writes:
> I think the crucial point for any TeX community is the ability to use
> the rather huge amount of BibTeX legacy DBs.
>
> How about the state of CSL (or RDF) to BibTeX converters?
I don't care about BibTeX myself, so such things aren't my focus.
However, I think a g
Taco Hoekwater elvenkind.com> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Andreas Wagner wrote:
> > Just out of curiosity: What are your reasons for preferring this over TEI:
>
> MODS was a logical choice mostly my background (scientific publishers
> => MARC databases => MODS), and that BruceD'Arcus liked it. Btw,
>
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thomas A.Schmitz
wrote:
> Expert fonts have been mentioned on this list several times, but I'd
> like to know if anybody could point me to e tutorial/example how to
> make them work in Context. The background of my question: on my Mac, I
> have a nice-looking truetype fo
someone (not sure who) said:
> I know XML source should work, but at least for me, creating XML source
> is unproductive. I work with a text editor and find writing this:
>
> ``Hello world,'' says HAL.
>
> much more productive than writing this:
>
> “Hello world”, says HAL.
>
> Maybe I'm miss
Wolfgang Schuster googlemail.com> writes:
> Am 23.03.2009 um 22:51 schrieb Mohamed Bana:
>
> > I personally would like see a "professionally done" typescript for
> > Minion and Warnock Pro with Myriad and Cronos Pro. I posted mine a
> > while ago, but I got no feed back.
>
> Because people
Wolfgang Schuster googlemail.com> writes:
> Am 31.03.2009 um 09:27 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
>
> >> Will this new module also provide BibX support?
> >
> > Perhaps ;)
> >
> > On the input side, the new module will load bibliographies from disk
> > into an internal XML structure and then use lpath
Taco Hoekwater elvenkind.com> writes:
> Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> > Wolfgang Schuster googlemail.com> writes:
> >
> >> Am 31.03.2009 um 09:27 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
> >>
> >>>> Will this new module also provide BibX support?
> >
Taco Hoekwater elvenkind.com> writes:
> The new structure and referencing code is totally different from
> the old code and I understand less than half of it. What's worse:
> I seem to be really bad at explaining to Hans all the things that
> should happen wrt. references in the bib module.
:-)
Hans Hagen wxs.nl> writes:
...
> in which case it keeps the input in xml and converts to other formats
> (coule be tex in the case of rendering print).
As Hans says, if you're interesting in integrating XML and RDF in source
documents, you need to think of ConTeXt as a lower-level output forma
John Haltiwanger gmail.com> writes:
[...]
> Markdown with RDFa on the side will suit quite nicely, thanks to pandoc.
Actually, you can embed the RDFa within the markdown files if you like.
# Introduction
Test.
Pandoc will just pass it on to the output XHTML (though throw it out for the
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
>
>> Bruce,
>>
>> very briefly: I'm very very short on time this week, so won't be able to
>> look into this until middle of next week, but I just wanted to let you know
>> that I find your idea
15 matches
Mail list logo
