On 10/7/2010 9:09 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Did you by any chance set the variable TEXMF in your environment?
After much ado, I finally got everything working again. I deleted
everything (as usual), and then simplified my PATH (removing Cygwin and
MikTeX, among others), cleaned up my environ
On 10/6/2010 3:10 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Are the binaries in C:\ConTeXt\tex\texmf-mswin\bin or
C:\ConTeXt\texmf-mswin\bin? That is - with or without tex?
In the path the first entry is
PATH=C:\ConTeXt\tex\texmf-mswin\bin;
That is, then 'with tex.'
What does
mtxrun --generate
return
While I'm pretty sure I didn't do anything wrong, and I'm absolutely
certain that it worked perfectly yesterday, ConTeXt is broken:
C:\ConTeXt>path
PATH=C:\ConTeXt\tex\texmf-mswin\bin;C:\Ruby187\bin;c:\bin;c:\tsepro;c:\program
iles\vim\vim72;c:\cygwin\bin;C:\Program
Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_18\bin;
The information on this page
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Configure_TeXnicCenter_for_ConTeXt ends up
invoking MkII (i.e. texexec). Is there any information on the
equivalent MkIV configuration?
The commands given above are:
(A) Path to the compiler...
C:\ConTeXt\usr\local\context\tex\setu
On 10/5/2010 2:30 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
I remember \setmainfont
and not \setupmainfont
That seems to work. Thank you very much. I appreciate your help.
Tom.
___
If your question is of interest to others as w
On 10/5/2010 2:06 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Using the font should be as easy as
\usemodule[simplefonts]
\setupmainfont[Concrete Roman]
! Undefined control sequence.
\setupmainfront
l.3 \setupmainfont
[Concrete Roman]
?
I spent quite some time yesterday trying to find out
On 10/5/2010 1:07 PM, Florian Wobbe wrote:
This is the result of the broken TeXLive 2010 installation. It should
have worked out of the box before your failed update attempt. Try
again with a clean TeXLive 2010 or install minimals.
This is the second trap I fell into by following the instruct
On 10/5/2010 12:32 PM, David Rogers wrote:
"texexec" gives MkII; "context" gives MkIV. I think this may need to be
documented somewhere easier to find for those new to ConTeXt.
I fell into this trap because either the Beginner's manual or some other
specifically says to run TeXexec instead of
On 10/3/2010 1:16 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
I think that you are confused by the terminology.
I was, but you have resolved that. Your answer was, as you perfectly
well know, completely correct. Thank you (all of you!) for your help in
getting me straightened out.
I'm (rather obviously) a
Hello,
I have pretty recent installations of TeXLive 2010 (for Cygwin) and
ConTeXt Minimals (for Windows). In both installations, running TeXexec
reports it is ConTeXt MkII ... but running ConTeXt directly reports
itself as MkIV.
I would like to synchronize TeXexec and MkIV ... as MkIV ...
10 matches
Mail list logo