2011/8/18 Mojca Miklavec :
> If you need to quickly find a picture of women with bunny ears for
> party invitation for example ...
http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1f46f/index.htm ? :-)
http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1f5fe/index.htm %-}
Was Unicode ever serious?
Best
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 18:17, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 05:29:43PM +0200, Patrick Gundlach wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to have "my" typesetting system to be capable of what users
>> demands and not what I think is good for them.
If you have a typesetting system, you can still extrac
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 05:29:43PM +0200, Patrick Gundlach wrote:
>
> > It is a bitmap format, a sort of quick and dirty hack by Apple to please
> > certain markets and it shouldn't concern a typesetting system
>
> I think we should leave it up to the users what they think about using
> a font li
> It is a bitmap format, a sort of quick and dirty hack by Apple to please
> certain markets and it shouldn't concern a typesetting system
I think we should leave it up to the users what they think about using a font
like this in typesetting. "640k ought to be enough for anybody"…
:)
I'd like
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:08:18PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> As far as LuaTeX support is concerned, here was the latest answer:
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 20:20, Hartmut Henkel wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
> >
> >> (Hartmut, if you're interested in this funny font thread
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 09:12, Patrick Gundlach wrote:
> Hello Wolfgang,
>
>> Apples new emoji font is also very interesting but you can’t use it with
>> ConTeXt.
>
> Why is that? Is this a ConTeXt or a LuaTeX limitation?
LuaTeX. Actually, it is a limitation of 99.9% of software out there. I
wasn
