On 04/17/2018 05:25 PM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
I can’t test musl support, but the new code should avoid the problem
Thomas experienced.
Best,
Arthur
I haven't had any trouble so far but need to test with another computer,
tonight.
Thomas
___
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2018-04-13 um 13:42 schrieb Henri Menke :
Exactly. We have that. And most bits and pieces are in place to allow
that, except for the problem with mtxrun not being able to determine
the platform correctly.
Actually, the musl detection only ha
Am 2018-04-13 um 13:42 schrieb Henri Menke :
>> Exactly. We have that. And most bits and pieces are in place to allow
>> that, except for the problem with mtxrun not being able to determine
>> the platform correctly.
>
> Actually, the musl detection only has to be peformed for downloading
> binar
On 4/13/2018 1:14 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On 11 April 2018 at 22:37, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4/11/2018 10:08 PM, Brian Hunt wrote:
3. Add texlua (and texluac?) to
a. the setup rsync bin/ directories
b. the tex/texmf-linuxmusl(|-ppc|-64)
we don't use texluac, don't need texlua on windo
On 04/13/2018 11:14 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On 11 April 2018 at 22:37, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> On 4/11/2018 10:08 PM, Brian Hunt wrote:
>>
>>> 3. Add texlua (and texluac?) to
>>>a. the setup rsync bin/ directories
>>>b. the tex/texmf-linuxmusl(|-ppc|-64)
>>
>> we don't use texluac, don't n
On 11 April 2018 at 22:37, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 4/11/2018 10:08 PM, Brian Hunt wrote:
>
>> 3. Add texlua (and texluac?) to
>>a. the setup rsync bin/ directories
>>b. the tex/texmf-linuxmusl(|-ppc|-64)
>
> we don't use texluac, don't need texlua on windows and on linux texlua is
> just a s
For those interested in reproducing the issues experienced on Alpine, I've
published an image that you should be able to start with:
$ docker run -ti brianmhunt/context-alpine:demo
(You can see the Dockerfile etc here:
https://hub.docker.com/r/brianmhunt/context-alpine/)
That image applies the T
On Wed, 2018-04-11 at 20:08 +, Brian Hunt wrote:
> So here's what I've got for a TODO so far to get ConTeXt working on Alpine
> Linux with musl (subject to item #6, mtx-context.lua not being found):
>
> 1. Add the musl test to first-setup.sh
> 2. Add the same musl test to tex/setuptex
> 3. Add
Aditya: I did indeed; it fails with `mtxrun | unknown script
'base.lua' or 'mtx-base.lua'` (sorry I didn't report this).
Hans:
> if musl needs different bin then there should be a different initial
> download i think because basically we're now talking of: windows, osx,
> linux, linuxmus
On 4/11/2018 10:08 PM, Brian Hunt wrote:
So here's what I've got for a TODO so far to get ConTeXt working on
Alpine Linux with musl (subject to item #6, mtx-context.lua not being
found):
1. Add the musl test to first-setup.sh
2. Add the same musl test to tex/setuptex
no problem adding a robu
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Brian Hunt wrote:
6. `context` is unable to locate `mtx-context.lua`. Some tracker output
sheds some light:
Have you run
luatools --generate
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to oth
So here's what I've got for a TODO so far to get ConTeXt working on Alpine
Linux with musl (subject to item #6, mtx-context.lua not being found):
1. Add the musl test to first-setup.sh
2. Add the same musl test to tex/setuptex
3. Add texlua (and texluac?) to
a. the setup rsync bin/ directories
> That’s what I was saying. But you seemed to imply that grep -F 'musl'
> was preferable to grep -E '^musl' from a portability and robustness
> point of view.
Sorry if I was unclear; `grep -F` is preferable to `fgrep` since the latter
is less portable, and `grep -F` may be preferable to `-E` beca
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:05:12AM +, Brian Hunt wrote:
>> The caret in itself was not the problem, only that it was not escaped
>> for the shell. Testing a regexp, with -E of course, is just as robust,
>> and allows us to be more specific about what we test.
>
> Either is fine I am sure
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:05:12 +
Brian Hunt wrote:
> from a code maintenance and testing
> perspective I'd be more concerned about a regression or
> misinterpretation to an unescaped carat that breaks the detection on
> zsh
Doesn't *everybody* use zsh?
;-)
A few more notes:
1. Missing texlua - found
The missing `texlua` from `bin/` and `tex/texmf-linuxmusl-64/bin` appears
to be a problem originating at the rsync source, notably it appears that
`texlua` is missing from these paths:
http://standalone.contextgarden.net/setup/linuxmusl-64/
http://stand
> The caret in itself was not the problem, only that it was not escaped
> for the shell. Testing a regexp, with -E of course, is just as robust,
> and allows us to be more specific about what we test.
Either is fine I am sure, but from a code maintenance and testing
perspective I'd be more conce
> A few notes:
> a.) On some platforms fgrep has been deprecated (in favour of `grep -F`) so
> it's not future-proof
I don’t think the aliases fgrep and egrep have ever been supposed to
be portable. POSIX has grep -F and grep -E, and that’s what we should
use.
> b.) The caret (^) passed to `gr
Here are a couple experimental observations.
1. Detecting musl.
-- Alpine Linux/sh --
$ ldd --version 2>&1 | grep -F musl
musl libc (x86_64)
$? = 0
-- Debian/bash --
$ ldd --version 2>&1 | grep -F musl
(nothing; $? = 1)
-- Debian/zsh --
$ ldd --version 2>&1 | grep -F musl
(nothing; $? = 1)
A
On Sun, 2018-04-08 at 22:50 +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Dear Brian,
>
> On 8 April 2018 at 16:56, Brian Hunt wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Per this question on tex.StackOverflow, I am having trouble getting ConTeXt
> > (LuaTeX specifically) to run on Alpine Linux:
> >
> > https://te
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 09:26:35AM +1200, Henri Menke wrote:
> This only blows up on Zsh. I will contact the "config.guess" maintainer (from
> where I stole that snippet).
The unescaped caret is only a problem on zsh with EXTENDED_GLOB
activated, but the effect of grep -q is problematic, and no
On Sun, 2018-04-08 at 22:50 +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Dear Brian,
>
> On 8 April 2018 at 16:56, Brian Hunt wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Per this question on tex.StackOverflow, I am having trouble getting ConTeXt
> > (LuaTeX specifically) to run on Alpine Linux:
> >
> > https://te
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 10:50:16PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> I need to finish "parsing"
> https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2018/091123.html
I was wondering if anyone had paid attention to that :-) I realise
the explanation is a bit long, but there were many details and I th
Dear Brian,
On 8 April 2018 at 16:56, Brian Hunt wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Per this question on tex.StackOverflow, I am having trouble getting ConTeXt
> (LuaTeX specifically) to run on Alpine Linux:
>
> https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/425463
>
> Specifically, the build from ConTeXt stan
Hello everyone,
Per this question on tex.StackOverflow, I am having trouble getting ConTeXt
(LuaTeX specifically) to run on Alpine Linux:
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/425463
Specifically, the build from ConTeXt standalone has a LuaTeX that seems not
to run against the musl libc6 libra
25 matches
Mail list logo
