Yue Wang wrote:
> MtxRun | total runtime: 67.548
first run? or when the windows cache is nicely filled?
how much memory? (vista needs some 2 gig at least)
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Hi:
> lua garbage collection on xp is somehow quite slow, when i switched to
> vista, the luatex test files (mk) that took forever on xp, ran smoothly
> on vista
OK. Today I got a copy of windows vista, so I installed it on the same
machine, and test the same tex file.
\usetypescript[myfont]
\set
I usually compose short documents (paper, homework, report etc.) which
usually runs 8-10 pages.
There will be considerable difference between traditional TeX (CJK for
LaTeX, or pdftex MKII using subfonts) and MKIV.
That means, every MKIV Chinese document I compile will spend 10
seconds loading the
Yue Wang wrote:
> (Of course, 15.854s runtime is still a bit too long, but that's tolerable)
you should not take a one page document as benchmark, since then there's
always the dominant overhead of loading fonts and writing resources to
the pdf file
-
Hi:
>
> @@ buying a copy of vista is not on my budget too expansive.
> I will test this on GNU/Linux later.
The result on the same machine running 32bit GNU/Linux.
\usetypescriptfile[zhfonts]
\usetypescript[myfont]
\setupbodyfont[myfont,rm,11pt]
\starttext
你好 {\it 你好} {\bf 你好}
\stoptext
MtxR
Hi:
>
> for the moment, a way out of your problem is (please wikify this)
>
> \synchronizemathfontsfalse
>
Woo... It is much faster! Thanks for your magic.
你好 {\it 你好} {\bf 你好} use 24.750s,
你好 use 11.766s,
Hello World use 6.438s.
I will wikify this together with a short introduction for chi
On Sep 12, 2008, at 10:15 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> (4) at some point (and there are already a few areas where this si
> true)
> luatex/mkiv will be faster than a traditional tex engine where all
> happens in macros (or is hadcodes)
Just a very short remark: I'm testing my presentation stuff
Mohamed Bana wrote:
> I've also been wondering why LuaTeX is considerably slower than XeTeX. Has
> anyone been doing any research into LuaJIT?
(1) luajit is non portable (not on all architectures) so for the moment
it's no option
(2) luatex will always be slower, because we do many things in l
I've also been wondering why LuaTeX is considerably slower than XeTeX. Has
anyone been doing any research into LuaJIT?
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist
Yue Wang wrote:
> Oh, My God. What's wrong on my system? Umm...
> Can you give me a hint to find what's wrong here?
> I use the minimals GUI installer, and after installation,
> I copy the fonts to texmf-fonts/fonts/opentype.
when you set fonts.trace=true you will see that many fonts are defin
Yue Wang wrote:
> Oh, My God. What's wrong on my system? Umm...
> Can you give me a hint to find what's wrong here?
> I use the minimals GUI installer, and after installation,
> I copy the fonts to texmf-fonts/fonts/opentype.
>
> Is there a profile program in ConTeXt available? (I know there i
Oh, My God. What's wrong on my system? Umm...
Can you give me a hint to find what's wrong here?
I use the minimals GUI installer, and after installation,
I copy the fonts to texmf-fonts/fonts/opentype.
Is there a profile program in ConTeXt available? (I know there is a
Memory Performance chart
Yue Wang wrote:
> \usetypescriptfile[zhfonts]
> \usetypescript[myfont]
> \setupbodyfont[myfont,rm,11pt]
> \starttext
> 你好 {\it 你好} {\bf 你好}
> \stoptext
> MtxRun | total runtime: 194.156
> If no Chinese fonts are used, three cases are tested:
> \usetypescriptfile[zhfonts]
> \usetypescript[myfont
Yue Wang wrote:
> Hi:
>
> The following cases all use second run of context. So there is no font
> cache time. I use a new installed Windows XP SP3 on a Core 2 Duo
> 1.68GHz with 1GB mem machine. Only TeXWorks and ConTeXt are installed
> and running on the machine. I close all pre-installed softwa
Am 12.09.2008 um 16:30 schrieb Yue Wang:
> Hi:
>
> The following cases all use second run of context. So there is no font
> cache time. I use a new installed Windows XP SP3 on a Core 2 Duo
> 1.68GHz with 1GB mem machine. Only TeXWorks and ConTeXt are installed
> and running on the machine. I clos
Hi:
The following cases all use second run of context. So there is no font
cache time. I use a new installed Windows XP SP3 on a Core 2 Duo
1.68GHz with 1GB mem machine. Only TeXWorks and ConTeXt are installed
and running on the machine. I close all pre-installed software (like
MSN, IE, etc.) and
16 matches
Mail list logo
