Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Switcher?

2003-12-10 Thread Berend de Boer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Giuseppe Bilotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I agree with you. Productive editing of XML document requires > specialized editors, and I still haven't found an (open source) > one that was up to the task. Vex is quite promising, in this > regard. It

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Switcher?

2003-12-09 Thread Bob Kerstetter
On Dec 9, 2003, at 5:39 PM, Christopher G D Tipper wrote: On Dec 8, 2003, at 2:33 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: Am Montag, 08.12.03, um 18:20 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Bob Kerstetter: ConTeXt is very attractive because of its detailed control, layers, colors, few or no packages(!), magical

Re[2]: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Switcher?

2003-12-09 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Wednesday, December 10, 2003 Christopher G D Tipper wrote: > This is probably taboo, but surely the smart thing to do > is start from Word, generate some XML with macros, and > produce some HTML with stylesheets, some PDF with ConTeXt. > BTW you can generate some simple Context with VB macros and

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Switcher?

2003-12-09 Thread Christopher G D Tipper
> On Dec 8, 2003, at 2:33 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > > > Am Montag, 08.12.03, um 18:20 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Bob > > Kerstetter: > >> ConTeXt is very attractive because of its detailed control, layers, > >> colors, few or no packages(!), magical developers, and on and on. > >> I

Re[2]: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Switcher?

2003-12-09 Thread Hans Hagen
At 23:06 08/12/2003, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: Monday, December 8, 2003 Bob Kerstetter wrote: > I know XML source should work, but at least for me, creating XML source > is unproductive. I work with a text editor and find writing this: > ``Hello world,'' says HAL. > much more productive than writi

Re[2]: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Switcher?

2003-12-08 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Monday, December 8, 2003 Bob Kerstetter wrote: > I know XML source should work, but at least for me, creating XML source > is unproductive. I work with a text editor and find writing this: > ``Hello world,'' says HAL. > much more productive than writing this: > “Hello world”, says HAL. > Mayb

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Switcher?

2003-12-08 Thread Bob Kerstetter
On Dec 8, 2003, at 2:33 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: Am Montag, 08.12.03, um 18:20 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Bob Kerstetter: ConTeXt is very attractive because of its detailed control, layers, colors, few or no packages(!), magical developers, and on and on. It can obvious produce PDF.

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Switcher?

2003-12-08 Thread Bob Kerstetter
On Dec 8, 2003, at 12:55 PM, Peter Münster wrote: On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Bob Kerstetter wrote: It can obvious produce PDF. Can it also produce HTML and Word from the same document? Hello, I like TeX4ht for LaTeX. It would be great, if TeX4ht and ConTeXt work together. It seems, that it works well wi

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Switcher?

2003-12-08 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am Montag, 08.12.03, um 18:20 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Bob Kerstetter: ConTeXt is very attractive because of its detailed control, layers, colors, few or no packages(!), magical developers, and on and on. It can obvious produce PDF. Can it also produce HTML and Word from the same documen

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Switcher?

2003-12-08 Thread Peter Münster
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Bob Kerstetter wrote: > It can obvious produce PDF. Can it also produce HTML and Word from the > same document? Hello, I like TeX4ht for LaTeX. It would be great, if TeX4ht and ConTeXt work together. It seems, that it works well with plain-TeX, so why not with ConTeXt? Peter

[NTG-context] ConTeXt Switcher?

2003-12-08 Thread Bob Kerstetter
Hello ConTeXt Users, I have been using LaTeX for 15 months or so. From one source document I am able to produce: 1. PDF 2. HTML 3. Word (via HTML conversion) ConTeXt is very attractive because of its detailed control, layers, colors, few or no packages(!), magical developers, and on and on.