On Thursday 03 of March 2011 03:49:47 Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Mi, 02 Mär 2011, Martin Schröder wrote:
> > *On topic* I'd also _very_ much like to see what's up with ConTeXt
> > licensing. From what it seems it looks like TeX Live is relicensing
> > ConTeXt in its
>
> ??? How do you come to th
On Mi, 02 Mär 2011, Martin Schröder wrote:
> *On topic* I'd also _very_ much like to see what's up with ConTeXt licensing.
> From what it seems it looks like TeX Live is relicensing ConTeXt in its
??? How do you come to that conclusion?
TeX Live is *NOT* relicensing *anything*. THe REDAME and COP
On 2-3-2011 12:10, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi,
On 03/02/11 11:41, Martin Schröder wrote:
It's a nice joke, but for practical purposes a one-clause BSD
license allows the same freedoms, but is legally clear.
Same for me, but in collaborative works, that is usually not doable.
Once a single line
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:40, Matija Šuklje wrote:
>
> *On topic* I'd also _very_ much like to see what's up with ConTeXt licensing.
> From what it seems it looks like TeX Live is relicensing ConTeXt in its
> distribution. And both helping the Gentoo Licensing team and being Deputy
> Legal Coordina
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 12:08:35PM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2011/3/2 Khaled Hosny :
> > I was about to say that, though I'm pro strong copyleft (AKA GPL when
> > fits) myself, though I highly doubt, for practical reasons ;), that any
> > one can take a BSD licensed ConTeXt and make a closed
Hi,
On 03/02/11 11:41, Martin Schröder wrote:
>
> It's a nice joke, but for practical purposes a one-clause BSD
> license allows the same freedoms, but is legally clear.
Same for me, but in collaborative works, that is usually not doable.
Once a single line of a project is GPL-ed, all of it has
2011/3/2 Khaled Hosny :
> I was about to say that, though I'm pro strong copyleft (AKA GPL when
> fits) myself, though I highly doubt, for practical reasons ;), that any
> one can take a BSD licensed ConTeXt and make a closed source derivative
> with any substantial improvement.
That may be legall
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 11:41:58AM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2011/3/2 Mojca Miklavec :
> > I really like the particular answer pointing to bugroff licence:
> > http://www.reocities.com/SoHo/Cafe/5947/bugroff.html
>
> It's a nice joke, but for practical purposes a one-clause BSD
> license
2011/3/2 Mojca Miklavec :
> I really like the particular answer pointing to bugroff licence:
> http://www.reocities.com/SoHo/Cafe/5947/bugroff.html
It's a nice joke, but for practical purposes a one-clause BSD
license allows the same freedoms, but is legally clear.
Best
Martin
_
On Wednesday 02 of March 2011 11:30:03 Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 22:37, Joseph Wright wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > A question came up recently on the tex.sx site about ConTeXt licensing:
> >
> > http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/12431/using-context-commercially
>
> I r
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 22:37, Joseph Wright wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> A question came up recently on the tex.sx site about ConTeXt licensing:
>
> http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/12431/using-context-commercially
I really like the particular answer pointing to bugroff licence:
http://www.re
On 1 mrt. 2011, at 22:37, Joseph Wright
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> A question came up recently on the tex.sx site about ConTeXt licensing:
>
> http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/12431/using-context-commercially
>
> I have a feeling I've seen something similar elsewhere recently, but
> cann
> You won't get a more "official" response than
> http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/mreadme.pdf
>
> ". . . and don’t bother discussing licence issues and related things
> with us for the mere sake of discussing licence stuff."
>
> If someone wants to use ConTeXt commercially I advise her
2011/3/1 Joseph Wright :
> This question seems to require an 'official' response, as things do seem
> a little confusing (at least to me). I'm happy to post something as a
You won't get a more "official" response than
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/mreadme.pdf
". . . and don’t bother d
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Joseph Wright wrote:
Hello all,
A question came up recently on the tex.sx site about ConTeXt licensing:
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/12431/using-context-commercially
I have a feeling I've seen something similar elsewhere recently, but
cannot be sure where.
Perh
Hello all,
A question came up recently on the tex.sx site about ConTeXt licensing:
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/12431/using-context-commercially
I have a feeling I've seen something similar elsewhere recently, but
cannot be sure where.
This question seems to require an 'official' resp
16 matches
Mail list logo
