Basically it seems coherent with the luatex manual (ch. 7 Font structure):
luatex read the txr.tfm file and set the checksum to the unsigned int 0
(luafont.w ,int font_from_lua(lua_State * L, int f)) (but see Note below)
Then read the vf
(dofont.w, do_vf(f) inside static int do_define_font(int f
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:54 AM, luigi scarso wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
>> Hello,
>> ** luigi scarso [2012-02-01 08:45:18 +0100]:
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
>>
I specially chose that font (txr, txr.tfm and txr.vf files)
Am Wed, 1 Feb 2012 17:23:09 +0200 schrieb Khaled Hosny:
> I tried printing the tfm table we pass to the backed, and the checksum
> matches the one in the VF file, so this is a bit confusing
Well I actually don't know what test is actually done (and why
exactly) but some remarks:
1. If I try to
On 2-2-2012 02:21, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this how I understand TFM font and currect
state of tex engines (actually pdftex, xetex and luatex):
sort of wrong
1. to use any font in tex one need a TFM file (file name = fontname.TFM),
that file actually contain inform
Am Thu, 2 Feb 2012 10:21:03 +0900 schrieb Vladimir Lomov:
> 1. if PDF output is only interesting then it is Ok, ignore that message,
> because font information is already in PDF and PDF programs should deal
> with it;
It doesn't depend on the output format. The checksum of vf and
tfm-files are c
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
> Hello,
> ** luigi scarso [2012-02-01 15:04:07 +0100]:
> [...]
>
>>> I was not sure, that why I began this thread. I started with latex example,
>>> then strip it down to plain tex one and after that came to context
>>> minimal example.
>> it'
Hello,
** luigi scarso [2012-02-01 15:04:07 +0100]:
[...]
>> I was not sure, that why I began this thread. I started with latex example,
>> then strip it down to plain tex one and after that came to context
>> minimal example.
> it's also in pdftex: see
> function vf_def_font
> in
> src/texk/web2c
Hello,
** Hans Hagen [2012-02-01 15:22:58 +0100]:
> On 1-2-2012 15:15, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
> >Am Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:54:04 +0100 schrieb luigi scarso:
>>>It's not related to MKIV but to luatex.
>>I think it is related to MKIV (or more precisely to the fontloader).
>>It is a bit difficult to de
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:47:32PM +0100, luigi scarso wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
> > Am Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:54:04 +0100 schrieb luigi scarso:
> >
> >> It's not related to MKIV but to luatex.
> >
> > I think it is related to MKIV (or more precisely to the fontloa
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:15:14PM +0100, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
> So the code from luaotfload (which is based on the context
> fontloader code) changes a checksum (either in the vf or in the
> tfm-information) and so the check in the luatex engines fails.
I tried printing the tfm table we pass to
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
> Am Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:54:04 +0100 schrieb luigi scarso:
>
>> It's not related to MKIV but to luatex.
>
> I think it is related to MKIV (or more precisely to the fontloader).
The message can be reproduced also with luatex --fmt=luatex-plain.fm
On 1-2-2012 15:15, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Am Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:54:04 +0100 schrieb luigi scarso:
It's not related to MKIV but to luatex.
I think it is related to MKIV (or more precisely to the fontloader).
It is a bit difficult to demonstrate it with context (how to you use
luatex without mk
Am Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:54:04 +0100 schrieb luigi scarso:
> It's not related to MKIV but to luatex.
I think it is related to MKIV (or more precisely to the fontloader).
It is a bit difficult to demonstrate it with context (how to you use
luatex without mkiv there?) but latex (or plain) it is quite
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
>> We have
>
>> $>vftovp txr.vf
>> (VTITLE )
>> (FAMILY TXR)
>> (FACE F MRR)
>> (CODINGSCHEME TEX TEXT)
>> (DESIGNSIZE R 10.0)
>> (COMMENT DESIGNSIZE IS IN POINTS)
>> (COMMENT OTHER SIZES ARE MULTIPLES OF DESIGNSIZE)
>> (CHECKSUM O 32212676346)
Hello,
** luigi scarso [2012-02-01 10:54:04 +0100]:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
>> Hello,
>> ** luigi scarso [2012-02-01 08:45:18 +0100]:
>>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
I specially chose that font (txr, txr.tfm and txr.vf files), it
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
> Hello,
> ** luigi scarso [2012-02-01 08:45:18 +0100]:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
>
>>> I specially chose that font (txr, txr.tfm and txr.vf files), it is
>>> distributed by txfonts "package". May be you insta
Hello,
** luigi scarso [2012-02-01 08:45:18 +0100]:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
>> I specially chose that font (txr, txr.tfm and txr.vf files), it is
>> distributed by txfonts "package". May be you installation doesn't have
>> them because I installed context suite wi
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
> I specially chose that font (txr, txr.tfm and txr.vf files), it is
> distributed by txfonts "package". May be you installation doesn't have
> them because I installed context suite with './first-setup.sh --modules=all'.
>
> Nevertheless, tha
Hello,
** luigi scarso [2012-02-01 02:37:20 +0100]:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
>> Hello,
>> please consider the following example:
>>
>> \starttext
>> \font\test=txr \test abs
>> \stoptext
>>
>> I process this document with context (context --version -> 2012.01.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
> Hello,
> please consider the following example:
>
> \starttext
>
> \font\test=txr \test abs
>
> \stoptext
>
>
> I process this document with context (context --version -> 2012.01.25)
> nothing suspecious in terminal output but in log file
Hello,
please consider the following example:
\starttext
\font\test=txr \test abs
\stoptext
I process this document with context (context --version -> 2012.01.25)
nothing suspecious in terminal output but in log file I see "checksum mismatch",
$ grep 'checksum' ex8.log
checksum mismatch in fo
21 matches
Mail list logo
