Sietse,
I have confirmed, after significant testing, that 'convert -density 72'
against existing non-png images produces the expected results in context
output pdf documents.
But I'm left with another problem, again something that becomes apparent
as the difference between having two output
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Guy Stalnaker wrote:
But I'm left with another problem, again something that becomes apparent as
the difference between having two output formats in my document workflow:
markdown - pandoc - html/text - context tex - pdf. This time it's images
that are too wide for the
In case anyone else has been following this thread, here is the shell
script I wrote to resize an image width to 6.5x72dpi so they fit in the
standard letter pagesize \textwidth with 1-inch margins and add image
density/resolution information so that context correctly sizes them in
the PDF
2012/11/21 Guy Stalnaker jstal...@wisc.edu:
I get a very good pdf document, but there is one bewildering issue -- the
images in the ConTeXt output pdf document are scaled very small. All of
Sounds like the TeX engine gets the wrong idea about the dpi of the images.
Are you using MkII or MkIV?
I get the same results using texexec and context which means, if I understand
rightly, I have used both MkII and MkIV. Interestingly I get similar results
using oft as the pandit output. When I open the doc in LibreOffice the images
are all scaled too small. Yet I can right-click each and
Guy Stalnaker jstal...@wisc.edu wrote:
I get the same results using texexec and context which means, if I understand
rightly, I have used both MkII and MkIV.
Yes, this is correct.
Interestingly I get similar results using oft as the pandit output.
That does suggest it might be something in
Thanks - see my first post for a link to a web folder where you can find the
.tex file, the .pdf context produces, two screenshots of the differing image
treatment and two of the image files shown in the screenshots.
Guy Stalnaker
jstal...@wisc.edu
jimmyg...@gmail.com
On Nov 21, 2012, at
I suggest that you use 'identify' from ImageMagick to check your graphics.
identify -verbose foo.jpg
One graphic has a defined resolution (72ppi) and one has none.
I also use ImageMagick to automatically add the resolution info to the
graphics. No problems with graphic sizes since then. Here is
Well, that lead to an interesting experiment. I used convert to
-resample a set of images to 300dpi and redid the compile. They are all
now too bod, many off the right side of the page. Then did the same but
set to 72. They are still too big. Odd, from too small to too big.
I will try and be
Guy wrote:
Well, that lead to an interesting experiment. I used convert to -resample a
set of images to 300dpi and redid the compile. They are all now too bod,
many off the right side of the page. Then did the same but set to 72. They
are still too big. Odd, from too small to too big.
I think
Hello,
Thanks to Aditya I have discovered ConTeXt which, thus far, seems to
give me much more control over the images than LaTex does. Yay! Before
we get the reason for this post, I should note that my workflow is
MultiMarkdown file, pandoc output of standalone context file, then
context on
11 matches
Mail list logo
