I am (again) considering moving to ConTeXt. A few years ago I investigated
the move because I have apositive impression of the quality of the ConTeXt
project and because I find the standard LaTeX layouts ugly. At that time I
decided against it because the first thing I tried (a list within a list)
Gerben Wierda wrote:
I am (again) considering moving to ConTeXt. A few years ago I investigated
the move because I have apositive impression of the quality of the ConTeXt
project and because I find the standard LaTeX layouts ugly. At that time I
decided against it because the first thing I tried (a
Hans Hagen said this at Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:46:54 +0100:
>> - lettrine.sty (I have my own TeX code now, but lettrine is probably
better)
>
>your own code should not be a problem as long as you don;t overload low
level
>commands
Most of the lettrine basics are exposed in the DroppedCaps macros in
> Gerben Wierda wrote:
>> I am (again) considering moving to ConTeXt. A few years ago I
>> investigated
>> the move because I have apositive impression of the quality of the
>> ConTeXt
>> project and because I find the standard LaTeX layouts ugly. At that time
>> I
>> decided against it because the
Am 10.03.2005 um 10:59 schrieb Gerben Wierda:
What I do not understand is how these components end up in a directory
hierarchy.
What would be very nice is some sort of downloadable archive with some
sample basic project structures.
Reading the stuff above I still have no idea how to build a directo
On 11 Mar 2005, at 18:02, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 10.03.2005 um 10:59 schrieb Gerben Wierda:
What I do not understand is how these components end up in a directory
hierarchy.
What would be very nice is some sort of downloadable archive with some
sample basic project structures.
Reading the st
Relative paths work fine for me as long as they point to subdirectories.
However, I could never get something like ../figures to work on Mac Os
X,
but that might be my ignorance.
Matthias
but I might be wrong
On Mar 11, 2005, at 3:49 PM, Gerben Wierda wrote:
On 11 Mar 2005, at 18:02, Henning Hr
On 11 Mar 2005, at 21:58, Matthias Weber wrote:
Relative paths work fine for me as long as they point to
subdirectories.
However, I could never get something like ../figures to work on Mac
Os X,
but that might be my ignorance.
I just got ../images to work but thenmy product file is in a
subdir
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 10.03.2005 um 10:59 schrieb Gerben Wierda:
What I do not understand is how these components end up in a directory
hierarchy.
What would be very nice is some sort of downloadable archive with some
sample basic project structures.
Reading the stuff above I still have no
