Re: [NTG-context] Table "modules"

2018-10-29 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Joseph Wright wrote: Hans: Thanks for the quick reply. I'll suggest to the LaTeX team that we treat table modules as ConTeXt-specific/reserved, and will think of a different name. How about `package`? Aditya ___

Re: [NTG-context] Table "modules"

2018-10-29 Thread Joseph Wright
On 28/10/2018 16:06, Joseph Wright wrote: Hello all, Looking at management of global Lua tables (for the obvious cases ...), I notice that all of the core Mk IV files use the construct     if not modules then modules = { } end     modules[" From a ConTeXt point-of-view, is it acceptable for

Re: [NTG-context] Table "modules"

2018-10-28 Thread Hans Hagen
On 10/28/2018 5:06 PM, Joseph Wright wrote: Hello all, Looking at management of global Lua tables (for the obvious cases ...), I notice that all of the core Mk IV files use the construct     if not modules then modules = { } end     modules[" From a ConTeXt point-of-view, is it acceptable f

[NTG-context] Table "modules"

2018-10-28 Thread Joseph Wright
Hello all, Looking at management of global Lua tables (for the obvious cases ...), I notice that all of the core Mk IV files use the construct if not modules then modules = { } end modules["From a ConTeXt point-of-view, is it acceptable for third-parties to use this construct, or is i