> So why don't we develop our own flavor of Garamond?
Because there is enough work with the seven typefaces that are already
being worked on?
Arthur
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, ple
Hi, Taco,
Thanks for your clear explanation!
as had been pointed out by you,
TeX Gyre project is a font development effort,
not a redistribution.
So why don't we develop our own flavor of Garamond?
Yue Wang
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
>
> Yue Wang wrote
>and the Symbol font will not
> benefit from Gyre-ification due to its symbolic (non-text) nature.
Symbol fonts are basically Times-like typefaces with Greek glyphs and
some additional symbols used in math; the Greek letters are already
present in the TeX
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
> Yue Wang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think the two font families are distributed by URW in free licence?
>
> The license of URW Garamond prohibits modification so it can not be
> imporved upon bt the TeX Gyre project,
Sorry, I have to rephrase that. The license is such tha
Yue Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the two font families are distributed by URW in free licence?
The license of URW Garamond prohibits modification so it can not be
imporved upon bt the TeX Gyre project, and the Symbol font will not
benefit from Gyre-ification due to its symbolic (non-text) nat
Hi,
I think the two font families are distributed by URW in free licence?
Yue Wang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.