Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 12.05.2009 um 19:07 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
Only footnotes in section titles don't work - should they?
[...]
I couldn't construct a minimal failing example - any hints?
No solution but here is a test file:
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\starttext
Am 12.05.2009 um 19:07 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
Only footnotes in section titles don't work - should they?
[...]
I couldn't construct a minimal failing example - any hints?
No solution but here is a test file:
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\starttext
\section{foo\footnote{bar}}
Am 2009-05-10 um 18:44 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
But it doesn't work, it's always bytext, i.e. numbering runs
through from start to end.
And the marks still don't show up in the text!
(Latest minimals beta, 2009-05-10 18.30 MESZ)
I find this is fixed now (Beta 2009.05.12 17:37). Great,
Yanrui Li wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:17 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
I still get a major sectioning bug using the new beta mkiv
1. minimals from the garden
2. beta from http://pragma-ade.nl/context/beta/cont-tmf.zip
Am I alone in seeing this?
i'm still
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Yanrui Li wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:17 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
I still get a major sectioning bug using the new beta mkiv
1. minimals from the garden
2. beta from
On Thursday 07 May 2009 23:17:38 Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
I still get a major sectioning bug using the new beta mkiv
1. minimals from the garden
2. beta from http://pragma-ade.nl/context/beta/cont-tmf.zip
Am I alone in seeing this?
i'm still strugling with defaults (it's
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 23:17:38 Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
I still get a major sectioning bug using the new beta mkiv
1. minimals from the garden
2. beta from http://pragma-ade.nl/context/beta/cont-tmf.zip
Am I alone in seeing this?
i'm still strugling with
Am 2009-05-06 um 21:58 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
Hi Hans,
so you're back from Bachotek and ready to attack the bugs? The beta
you uploaded today is still badly broken. Most of this has been
reported before; I just collect it here for your convenience :-)
Sorry Thomas, but you forgot one:
On May 7, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2009-05-06 um 21:58 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
Hi Hans,
so you're back from Bachotek and ready to attack the bugs? The beta
you uploaded today is still badly broken. Most of this has been
reported before; I just collect it here
Am 2009-05-07 um 10:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
Sorry Thomas, but you forgot one:
We'd be incredibly lucky if there's only one that I missed :-)
Well, ATM I've some problems with headers and ToC, but I guess that's
only in my setup; couldn't reproduce it in my minimal example.
BTW (1)
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
BTW (1) font problems:
I'm using TeX Gyre and some Type1 fonts with MkIV nearly without
problems; didn't need to copy any files like you.
looks like an engine problem; we'll look into it
-
Am 07.05.2009 um 10:31 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
My minimal example shows some more problems, but these are probably
because \recurselevel isn't expanded at the right time...
\dorecurse{1000}{Use \type{\expanded{...}}\par}
Wolfgang
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2009-05-07 um 10:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
Sorry Thomas, but you forgot one:
We'd be incredibly lucky if there's only one that I missed :-)
Well, ATM I've some problems with headers and ToC, but I guess that's
only in my setup; couldn't reproduce it in my
Am 2009-05-07 um 13:38 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
My minimal example shows some more problems, but these are probably
because \recurselevel isn't expanded at the right time...
\dorecurse{1000}{Use \type{\expanded{...}}\par}
Hä? Was soll das?
I don't want to \type some command, but just to
Am 2009-05-07 um 14:44 schrieb Hans Hagen:
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2009-05-07 um 10:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
Sorry Thomas, but you forgot one:
We'd be incredibly lucky if there's only one that I missed :-)
Well, ATM I've some problems with headers and ToC, but I guess
that's
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2009-05-07 um 14:44 schrieb Hans Hagen:
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2009-05-07 um 10:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
Sorry Thomas, but you forgot one:
We'd be incredibly lucky if there's only one that I missed :-)
Well, ATM I've some problems with headers and
Am 07.05.2009 um 15:08 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
Am 2009-05-07 um 13:38 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
My minimal example shows some more problems, but these are
probably because \recurselevel isn't expanded at the right time...
\dorecurse{1000}{Use \type{\expanded{...}}\par}
Use
Am 07.05.2009 um 15:51 schrieb Alan BRASLAU:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 15:27:35 Hans Hagen wrote:
when i mention beta, i mean the one on the website ... the minimals
lag
upto an hour behind
Please, I am confused: which one on which website?
http://www.pragma-ade.nl/download-1.htm
contains
On Thursday 07 May 2009 15:56:19 Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 07.05.2009 um 15:51 schrieb Alan BRASLAU:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 15:27:35 Hans Hagen wrote:
when i mention beta, i mean the one on the website ... the minimals
lag
upto an hour behind
Please, I am confused: which one on
Am 2009-05-07 um 15:28 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
My minimal example shows some more problems, but these are
probably because \recurselevel isn't expanded at the right time...
\dorecurse{1000}{Use \type{\expanded{...}}\par}
Use \expanded{...}
Use \expanded{...}
...
Hä? Was soll das?
I
Am 07.05.2009 um 16:32 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
Unfortunately it is critical, where to put \expanded, and I tend to
take always the wrong place...
Therefore the minimal example is fixed; header and toc handlings
seems right, as I presumed.
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2009-05-06 um 21:58 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
Hi Hans,
so you're back from Bachotek and ready to attack the bugs? The beta
you uploaded today is still badly broken. Most of this has been
reported before; I just collect it here for your convenience :-)
Sorry
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
I still get a major sectioning bug using the new beta mkiv
1. minimals from the garden
2. beta from http://pragma-ade.nl/context/beta/cont-tmf.zip
Am I alone in seeing this?
i'm still strugling with defaults (it's not so much a matter of not
working but more of how to set
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Yanrui Li liyanrui...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:17 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
I still get a major sectioning bug using the new beta mkiv
1. minimals from the garden
2. beta from
Hi Hans,
so you're back from Bachotek and ready to attack the bugs? The beta
you uploaded today is still badly broken. Most of this has been
reported before; I just collect it here for your convenience :-)
1. The most urgent bug: The beta still fails to generate the files
Am 06.05.2009 um 21:58 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
2. The new structure code doesn't expand xmlflushes in sections.
Here's an example:
\setuphead[section][expansion=yes]
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of
On May 6, 2009, at 10:12 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
2. The new structure code doesn't expand xmlflushes in sections.
Here's an example:
\setuphead[section][expansion=yes]
Wolfgang
Thank you, that works! This is new, right?
Thomas
Am 06.05.2009 um 22:25 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
On May 6, 2009, at 10:12 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
2. The new structure code doesn't expand xmlflushes in sections.
Here's an example:
\setuphead[section][expansion=yes]
Thank you, that works! This is new, right?
Yes it is.
Another
28 matches
Mail list logo
